Comfort Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Brock
| Citation | 476 So.2d 927 |
| Decision Date | 25 September 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 17223-CA,17223-CA |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US) |
| Parties | COMFORT HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George H. BROCK d/b/a Home Associates, Defendant-Appellant. |
Kennedy, Goodman & Donovan by Gregory J. Barro, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.
Eatman & Hunter by Robert E. Eatman, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before FRED W. JONES, Jr., NORRIS and LINDSAY, JJ.
Comfort Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. ("Comfort") sued George H. Brock, d/b/a Home Associates ("Brock") for $1,400 for the partial installation of an air conditioning system in improvements under construction, which work was allegedly authorized by Brock's foreman-agent. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. For the reasons explained, we reverse.
The only evidence presented at the trial was the testimony of Frank Campisi, president of Comfort, who stated that he visited the construction site in question and conducted negotiations concerning air conditioning work with one Sherrett, who appeared to be in charge. At the time of their second meeting a contract was executed and work proceeded on the air conditioning system. Despite completion of about half the work, no money was paid as agreed and the work was stopped. This suit ensued.
Campisi conceded that he never met nor had any dealings with Brock. Furthermore, there was no evidence that Brock either owned the building site or was the contractor for the improvements.
Actual authority is established when the principal grants authority to the agent either by express or implied consent. Sales Purchasing Corp. v. Puckett, 417 So.2d 137 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982).
Apparent authority binds one under the rule of estoppel. Apparent authority arises when the alleged principal has (1) acted in such a manner that a third person is justified in believing that the alleged agent had certain authority, and (2) the third person reasonably relied on these actions. The alleged principal is then estopped to deny the existence of the agency relationship. National Bank of Bossier City v. Nations, 465 So.2d 929 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985); Hatfield v. Minden Bank & Trust Co., 361 So.2d 901 (La.App.2d Cir.1978).
Although Sherrett represented to Campisi that he was an agent for Brock, this alone did not create the appearance of an agency relationship. There was no evidence that Brock ever did anything to indicate the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tedesco v. Gentry Development, Inc.
...has certain authority; and (2) reasonable reliance of a third person as a result of these manifestations. Comfort Heating & Air Condition v. Brock, 476 So.2d 927 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985); National Bank of Bossier City v. Nations, 465 So.2d 929 (La.App. 2d In his extensive opinion, the trial ju......
-
Landmark Sav. Bank v. Greenwald
...be created either expressly or by implication, Bank of Greensburg v. Forrest, 520 So.2d 728 (La.1988); Comfort Heating & Air Cond., Inc. v. Brock, 476 So.2d 927 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985); Moreland v. Smith, 457 So.2d 748 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984), writ denied, 462 So.2d 196 (La.1984); Anderson Wind......
-
30-289 La.App. 2 Cir. 6/26/98, Farmers Cotton Co., Inc. v. Savage
...that the third party then reasonably rely upon the manifest authority of the agent. Boulos, supra; Comfort Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. v. Brock, 476 So.2d 927 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985). [30-289 La.App. 2 Cir. 6] In the instant case, neither Thomas nor Harold had any associations with Farmer......
-
Billups v. B.C. Enter. Grp., Inc.
...given an innocent third party a reasonable belief the agent had authority to act for the principal. Comfort Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Brock, 476 So.2d 927 (La.App. 2 Cir., 1985); Byles Welding & Tractor, Inc. v. McDaniel, 441 So.2d 48 (La.App. 3 Cir., 1983); Bamber Contractors, In......