Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Co. of West Virginia
Decision Date | 06 May 1913 |
Citation | 153 Ky. 566,156 S.W. 160 |
Parties | COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST CO. et al. v. CITIZENS' TRUST & GUARANTY CO. OF WEST VIRGINIA. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Chancery Branch, Second Division.
Suit by the Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company of West Virginia against the Commercial Bank & Trust Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Herman D. Newcomb, Hines & Norman, and Arthur B. Bensinger, all of Louisville, for appellants.
Wehle & Wehle and Helm & Helm, all of Louisville, for appellee.
The Commercial Bank & Trust Company, a corporation, was organized under the laws of this state and empowered to do a general banking and trust business in Louisville, Ky. Lloyd W. Gates is, and was in January, 1912, the treasurer of Jefferson county. As such he was required to give bond for the faithful performance of his duties. This he did, with the Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company, a West Virginia corporation, as surety. The Commercial Bank & Trust Company desiring to secure, at least, a part of the deposits of the county treasurer, entered into an agreement with him, whereby it obligated itself to furnish said treasurer security in the sum of $100,000 to secure the safety of any and all deposits which he might, as treasurer, make in said bank. The Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company likewise became the surety for said bank on said bond to the treasurer, but, before doing so, exacted of said bank a pledge of its liquid assets in the sum of $100,000 to secure it against loss. The bond of the bank to Gates, treasurer, was duly executed with the West Virginia corporation as surety, and the bank pledged with said surety certificates of deposit and short-term negotiable notes to the amount of $100,000. Under the arrangement between the bank and its surety, as these notes matured and were paid off or renewed, other paper of like value was substituted for that so paid or renewed. In this way the business continued from the time the arrangement was entered into up until January 13, 1913, when the bank was closed on the order, or on the suggestion, of the banking commissioner. At that time the value of the commercial paper claimed by the Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company as security for its liability on the treasurer's bond amounted to something like $70,000. All of this paper was held by the Louisville National Banking Company under an arrangement entered into between the Commercial Bank & Trust Company and the Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company. As a question was raised as to who was entitled to the possession thereof, the Louisville National Banking Company would not permit either to have it. Thereupon the Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company filed suit against the Louisville National Banking Company, the Commercial Bank & Trust Company, and Thomas J. Smith, banking commissioner, in charge of said Commercial Bank & Trust Company, in which it sought to have the said negotiable paper so held by the Louisville National Banking Company adjudged to it, and prayed for a mandatory order directing said Louisville National Banking Company to surrender up and turn over to it all of said paper; it being alleged that it was liable on this bond of the bank to Gates, the treasurer, in a sum in excess of the value of the paper so deposited with the Louisville National Banking Company. The Louisville National Banking Company answered, setting out fully the circumstances under which the said paper was placed in its possession; alleged that it had no interest therein further than a reasonable charge for its services in taking care of it; asked that the West Virginia corporation and the Commercial Bank & Trust Company, in the hands of the banking commissioner, be required to litigate the matter of ownership; and stated that it was ready and willing to deliver said notes to whomsoever the court should direct. The banking commissioner, Thomas J. Smith, answered for the defendant the Commercial Bank & Trust Company, and, in addition to traversing the allegations of the petition, pleaded that the paper held by the Louisville National Banking Company was the property and part of the assets of the Commercial Bank & Trust Company; that, by virtue of his office, he was entitled to its possession; that the alleged agreement by which it was turned over to and held by the Louisville National Banking Company as bailee, or custodian, was made by the parties in contemplation of the insolvency of the Commercial Bank & Trust Company, and with the view of preferring the West Virginia corporation over, and to the exclusion of, the other creditors of the Commercial Bank & Trust Company; and that, by reason of such fact, the attempted transfer was illegal, null, void, and of no effect. Other defenses were interposed, but for the purposes of this case they need not be considered. The affirmative matter in the answer of the banking commissioner was traversed. Upon the issue thus made the case was submitted to the chancellor for judgment upon the motion of the plaintiff for a temporary mandatory injunction, and of the defendant the banking commissioner for a temporary injunction on his answer, which was made a cross-petition against his codefendant the Louisville National Banking Company.
Upon consideration the chancellor was of opinion that plaintiff was entitled to the relief sought, and so adjudged. The motion of the banking commissioner was denied. Thereupon the parties entered into the following agreement: "It is hereby agreed between plaintiff, Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Company of West Virginia, and the defendants Commercial Bank & Trust Company and Thomas J. Smith, banking commissioner, and the Louisville National Banking Company, that on all issues raised between the plaintiff and these defendants the proof in the form of affidavits and exhibits and the pleadings of all parties filed herein, so far as uncontradicted, and the testimony heard by the court, and the cross-examination of affiants shall be treated and considered to be the formal and final testimony offered by said parties as between themselves, and to have the same force and effect as though such testimony was taken by deposition on notice and regularly filed herein; and these parties waive the setting of the case at rules and hereby agree to submit forthwith for final judgment, reserving and excepting for further consideration of the court any issues that are or may be raised as between the other parties hereto and the Louisville National Banking Company concerning the allowance, charges, fees, and expenses claimed by the Louisville National Banking Company."
The court, having considered the case, entered the following judgment:
Later said judgment was modified as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Williston v. Ludowese
...its assets to secure the payment of deposits, the authorities are not in harmony. The case of Commercial B. & T. Co. v. Citizens' T. & G. Co., 156 S. W. 160, 153 Ky. 566, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 950, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 166, is, however, the only case cited in the briefs directly challenging and d......
-
Texas Pac Ry Co v. Pottorff
...184 N.E. 750; Divide County v. Baird, 55 N.D. 45, 52, 212 N.W. 236, 51 A.L.R. 296; Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Co., 153 Ky. 566, 574, 156 S.W. 160, 45 L.R.A.(N.S.) 950, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 166; 27 Colum. Law Rev. 88; 79 U. of Penn Law Rev. 608, 614. 15 To insur......
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Village of Bassfield
...18CJ, p. 585, n. 33; p. 591, n. 68. On power of bank to pledge assets to secure deposit of public moneys, see annotation in 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 950; R. C. L. 419; 1 R. C. L. Supp. 822. (Division B. Oct. 3, 1927. Suggestion of Error Overruled Nov. 14, 1927.) --------- ...
-
City of Williston v. Ludowese
... ... State of North Dakota, Doing Business as the Bank of North Dakota; and the Williams County State ... Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens Trust & G ... depositors' guaranty fund commission and the Bank of ... North ... ...