Commercial Bank v. Central Nat. Bank

Decision Date29 April 1918
Docket NumberNo. 12840.,12840.
PartiesCOMMERCIAL BANK OF BOONVILLE v. CENTRAL NAT. BANK OF BOONVILLE.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cooper County; Jack G. Slate, Judge.

"Not to be officially published."

Action by the Commercial Bank of Boonville, Mo., against the Central National Bank of Boonville, Mo. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

W. G. & G. T. Pendleton and Roy D. Williams, all of Boonville, for appellant. John Cosgrove, of Boonville, for respondent.

BLAND, J.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $1,500, and defendant has appealed. Defendant insists that its demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained.

The evidence shows that on August 3, 1916, and 20 years prior thereto, a custom existed among the banks doing business is Boonville, Mo., that, when one bank was short of currency it would go to another bank and secure a temporary loan of money; that on said day A. H. Stephens, who was assistant cashier of the defendant bank, went to the plaintiff and asked for a temporary loan of $1,500, and that he agreed to return the same on the following day. A. H. Stephens was also a member of the automobile firm of Stephens & Son. It is not clear from the record whether the automobile concern had Previous to the time in question borrowed money of plaintiff. When the money was given to Mr. Stephens, the following memorandum was written upon a blank form of note in use by the plaintiff bank:

                "$1,500.       Boonville, Mo., ........, 189
                 ...... demand ........ after date 
                promise to pay to the order of the Commercial
                Bank of Boonville, Mo., fifteen hundred
                100 dollars, for value received, negotiable and
                payable without defalcation or discount at the
                Commercial Bank of Boonville, Mo., with interest
                at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum
                from  and interest to be compounded annually
                                     A. H. Stephens Son
                                    "A. H. Stephens."
                

The only words and figures contained in this memorandum that were inserted by Mr. Stephens were the figures $1,500 at the top left-hand corner of the memorandum and the words "demand", "fifteen hundred" and the signatures, "A. H. Stephens Son," "A. H. Stephens."

It will be seen from an examination of this memorandum that in the signatures the name of defendant bank does not appear. However, the president of plaintiff hank stated that Mr. Stephens, when he secured the money, stated that "he needed the $1,500 in currency at the bank and would return it next day," and that "the bank needed it." There is some slight evidence that the defendant bank received the $1,500, and, as the jury found for the plaintiff, we may assume that the defendant actually received the $1,500. The president of plaintiff testified that he did not look at the memorandum given by Stephens; that he understood he was loaning the money to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • May 7, 1979
    ...now contends. An attempt to reserve a right inconsistent with that asserted is ineffectual. The Belize, supra; Commercial Bank v. Central Nat. Bank, 203 S.W. 662 (Mo.App.1918). There was no error in the trial court's finding that GAC did not manifest an intention and desire to arbitrate, as......
  • Foster v. Modern Woodmen of America
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kansas
    • January 29, 1940
    ...... 104 Mo. 270, 16 S.W. 198; American Natl. Bank v. Klock, 58 Mo.App. 335. (4) A party is bound by his. ... Nanson v. Jacob, 93 Mo. 331, 6 S.W. 246;. Commercial Bank v. Central Nat. Bank, 203 S.W. 662;. 20 C. J., p. ......
  • Hoskins v. Hotel Randolph Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • December 16, 1926
    ...an inconsistent course later is of no avail to it. Clausen v. Head, 110 Wis. 405, 85 N. W. 1028, 84 Am. St. Rep. 933;Commercial Bank v. Central Bank (Mo. App.) 203 S. W. 662;People v. Board of Supervisors of Cortland County (Sup.) 15 N. Y. S. 748. On the plainest principles the Otis Company......
  • Hoskins v. Hotel Randolph Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • December 16, 1926
    ......405 (85 N.W. 1028, 84 Am. St. 933);. Commercial Bank v. Central Nat. Bank (Mo. App.), 203. S.W. 662; ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT