Commercial Credit Corp. v. McCorkle

Decision Date12 September 1973
Docket NumberNo. 7326DC448,7326DC448
Citation198 S.E.2d 736,19 N.C.App. 397
PartiesCOMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION, v. Bobby Joe McCORKLE.
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals

Fairley, Hamrick, Monteith & Cobb, by Laurence A. Cobb, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Joseph B. Roberts, III, Mount Holly, for defendant.

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The record on appeal reflects that summary judgment was rendered upon a consideration of the pleadings alone. In the pleadings defendant denied the allegation of the amount alleged by plaintiff to be due under the contract. Plaintiff offered no supporting affidavits, depositions, or answers to interrogatories, but elected to stand upon its allegation in its complaint of a sum due which defendant denied. According to the stipulations filed in this Court both the complaint and the answer were verified.

The trial court, upon motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, should not undertake to resolve an issue of credibility. Lee v. Shor, 10 N.C.App. 231, 178 S.E.2d 101. In this case plaintiff alleges defendant is indebted to plaintiff; defendant denies the allegation. Where a defendant denies the existence of the debt alleged, unless admissions by defendant clearly show that his denial of the debt is utterly baseless in fact, defendant's denial raises a genuine issue as to a material fact. Where a genuine issue as to a material fact is raised, summary judgment is improper. See G.S. § 1A--1, Rule 56(c). In this case defendant's admission that he executed the Transfer of Interest Agreement does not render his denial of the debt to be baseless. From the pleadings alone it cannot be determined as a fact that defendant owes the plaintiff a sum of money in any amount.

Reversed.

MORRIS and PARKER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ralph Stachon & Associates, Inc. v. Greenville Broadcasting Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 7, 1978
    ...31 N.C.App. 157, 229 S.E.2d 57 (1976), cert. denied, 291 N.C. 711, 232 S.E.2d 204 (1977). In Commercial Credit Corp. v. McCorkle, 19 N.C.App. 397 at p. 398, 198 S.E.2d 736 at p. 737 (1973), this Court "The trial court, upon motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, should not undertake to ......
  • Stancil v. Stancil
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 20, 1989
    ...of a material fact turns on the credibility of witnesses, as here, summary judgment is improper. Commercial Credit Corp. v. McCorkle, 19 N.C.App. 397, 198 S.E.2d 736 (1973); Lee, In ruling on defendant's summary judgment motion, the question for the trial court was whether defendant had est......
  • Hodges v. Johnson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1974
    ...(1971). In ruling on such a motion, the trial court should not undertake to resolve any issues of credibility. Credit Corp. v. McCorkle,19 N.C.App. 397, 198 S.E.2d 736 (1973). The pleadings before the court on the motions for summary judgment make no mention of the date on which plaintiff a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT