Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Street
| Decision Date | 20 February 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 75--199,75--199 |
| Citation | 327 So.2d 113 |
| Parties | COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE CO., and Otis Elevator Company, Appellants, v. Sonja STREET, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Gary M. Witters, of Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for appellants.
David A. Maney of Gordon & Maney, and Mulholland & Hapner, Tampa, for appellee.
Is res ipsa loquitur an applicable doctrine on which to predicate an elevator company's liability where the plaintiff is injured as a result of a malfunction of one of its elevators? The trial court held it was, notwithstanding a maintenance agreement stipulating that the hospital was in possession and control of the elevator, since the evidence revealed the elevator manufacturer was the installer and exclusive maintenance agent. We agree and affirm the judgment on the jury's verdict for the plaintiff.
Plaintiff, age 61, is employed by St. Joseph's Hospital. She testified she got on the elevator at the third floor of the hospital and pushed the ground button--that the elevator went 'zoom' and went down and bounced. She caught herself on the handrail and the elevator returned to the seventh floor, did not open, then dropped to the sixth floor, and stopped. The door opened and she got out.
The defendant, Otis, manufactured and installed the elevators in St. Joseph's Hospital and maintains them under a contract which stipulates that possession and control over the elevator resides exclusively in the Hospital. Mr. Tessier, the Tampa manager for Otis, testified that in response to notice of the plaintiff's accident, he sent a repairman to the Hospital, who after making a thorough inspection, reported he could not locate any malfunction. Mr. Johns, Otis's maintenance supervisor, testified the elevator was in compliance with all safety codes and there was no evidence after the accident to indicate there had been any 'free fall' at the time of the accident, but he declined to say that the accident could not have happened as the plaintiff testified.
Otis Elevator Company and its insurer, defendants below, contend the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was applicable in face of a maintenance contract between Otis and St. Joseph's Hospital, which specifically provided that possession and control over the elevator was vested in the Hospital where appellee/plaintiff's accident occurred. The jury was instructed that the doctrine was applicable to the plaintiff's cause of action where damages resulted from the injuries she received at the Hospital as a result of its elevator abruptly stopping and falling.
Appellants moved for a directed verdict on grounds there was no evidence that established Otis's exclusive control of the elevator in question. This motion and a motion for new trial were both denied. The only meritorious question on appeal concerns the propriety of the court's instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur under the circumstances of this case. There is a split of authority on the propriety of a res ipsa instruction...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Swann v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
...in part). In addition to New York and Nevada, Florida and Pennsylvania appear to take a similar stand. See Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Street, 327 So.2d 113 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1976); Johnson v. Otis Elevator Co., 225 Pa.Super. 500, 311 A.2d 656 (1973). Other states have addressed the issue, ......
-
Weeden v. Armor Elevator Co., Inc.
...on the part of the defendant maintenance company (see, e.g.,Otis Elevator Co. v. Seale, 334 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.); Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Street, 327 So.2d 113 (Fla.App.); American Elevator Co. v. Briscoe, 93 Nev. 665, 572 P.2d 534; Bond v. Otis Elevator Co., 388 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.); see,......
-
Bronz v. St. Jude's Hosp. Clinic
...negligence of the defendant on the theory of res ipsa loquitur. 216 Kan. at 343-44, 532 P.2d at 1056. See also Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Street, 327 So.2d 113 (Fla.App.1976); American Elevator Co. v. Briscoe, 93 Nev. 665, 572 P.2d 534 (1977); Bond v. Otis Elevator Co., 388 S.W.2d 681 (Te......
-
Otis Elevator Co. v. Chambliss
...(1st Cir.1986) (exclusivity where escalator owner/operator has maintenance contract with another party); Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Street, 327 So.2d 113 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976) (elevator maintenance contract providing that possession and control over the elevator remained exclusively wi......