Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of Springfield

• Decision Date: 06 November 1952
• Citation: 329 Mass. 419,108 N.E.2d 670
• Parties: COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS & TAXATION v. ASSESSORS OF SPRINGFIELD.
• Court: United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Page 670

108 N.E.2d 670

329 Mass. 419

COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS & TAXATION v. ASSESSORS OF SPRINGFIELD.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.

Argued Oct. 6, 1952.

Decided Nov. 6, 1952.

H. William Radovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation.

Charles D. Sloan, City Sol., Springfield, for appellee.

Before QUA, C. J., and RONAN, WILKINS, SPALDING and COUNIHAN, JJ.

WILKINS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board determining the valuation of the property of New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Western Union Telegraph Company, subject to taxation in the city of Springfield for the year 1950. G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 59, § 39, as amended by St.1933, c. 254, § 36, and St.1939, c. 451, § 22. ¹ The decision upheld the contentions of the board of assessors, which had appealed to the Appellate Tax Board from the valuations of the commissioner of corporations and taxation. The decision, however, was not rendered until December 13, 1951. In the preceding January the commissioner filed a motion that the assessors' appeal to the Appellate Tax Board be dismissed by reason of having become moot. The motion was denied, and the commissioner appealed.

The ground of mootness presented for consideration is that it had become too late for the assessors to make their assessment for 1950 under c. 59, § 39, as amended. This section provides that the valuation of the property of telephone and telegraph companies to be assessed by local assessors shall be determined in the first instance by the commissioner and certified by him before March 15 to the assessors, who, if aggrieved, may 'apply' within ten days to the Appellate Tax Board, whose decision as to valuation 'shall be final and conclusive' except for abatements by the commissioner under § 73. The assessors 'in the manner provided by law' shall assess the property 'as certified and at the value determined by the commissioner or by the appellate tax board'.

Section 73 of c. 59, as amended by St.1933, c. 254, § 44, provides in part: 'Any company aggrieved by the taxes assessed on it relating to any property valued in accordance with section thirty-nine may, on or before December first of the year to which the tax relates, apply to the commissioner for an abatement thereof; and if the commissioner finds that the company is taxed at more than its just proportion, or upon an assessment of any of its said property in excess of its fair cash value, he shall make a reasonable abatement.' It thus is evident that an aggrieved taxpayer must act not later than December 1 of the year to which the tax relates. Until an assessment is made by the assessors the taxpayer cannot act to protect itself. If a controversy between the commissioner and a local board of assessors is protracted beyond the year to which the tax relates, the taxpayer must sit futilely by while its rights expire, should the contention of the assessors in the present case be accepted.

Section 39 places no date or time limit for the determination by the Appellate Tax Board. But it is apparent that if the assessors are to assess 'in the manner provided by law' and in accordance with the board's decision, such decision must be made seasonably. The assessors must assess 'annually.' G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 59, § 23, as amended. See § 47, as amended. If any taxable estate of a person 'has been omitted from the annual assessment of taxes, the assessors shall between December tenth and twentieth following * * * or at such earlier time as the commissioner may in writing approve, assess such person for such estate.' G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 59, § 75, as amended by St.1934, c. 104, and St.1946, c. 339.

The record does not show that an assessment was made during the year 1950 in the case at bar. At the arguments before us, it was stated that an assessment had been made, but we are not sure in what amount. There was no stipulation of counsel. If an assessment was made in the amount determined by the commissioner, which was the only amount available for use in 1950, the case is moot. The higher valuation of the Appellate Tax Board could not be made the basis of an assessment of omitted property after December 20. Gannett v. Cambridge, 218 Mass. 60, 64-65, 105 N.E. 447. Nor would it be a tax 'which is invalid by...