Commonwealth v. Artz
| Decision Date | 15 March 1926 |
| Docket Number | 18 |
| Citation | 132 A. 575,285 Pa. 521 |
| Parties | Commonwealth v. Artz et al., Appellants |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued: January 26, 1926
Appeal, No. 18, March T., 1926, by defendants, from decree of C.P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1925, No. 1214, awarding injunction, in case of Commonwealth v. William J. Artz et al. Affirmed.
The decree is affirmed at cost of appellants.
Before MOSCHZISKER, C.J., FRAZER, WALLING, SIMPSON, KEPHART and SADLER, JJ.
This case involves a similar state of facts to those in Commonwealth v. Dietz (No. 19, March Term, 1926); hence the same rules of law apply as are discussed at length in that case, where we have this day filed an opinion.
The decree is affirmed at cost of appellants.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Kowats v. Arnold
... ... subject or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the ... fundamental law. Commonwealth v. Dietz, 285 Pa. 511, ... 132 A. 572; Commonwealth v. Artz, 285 Pa. 521, 132 ... A. 575. (13) The welfare of the indigent insane should be ... ...
-
State ex rel. Kowats v. Arnold
...or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law. Commonwealth v. Dietz, 285 Pa. 511, 132 Atl. 572; Commonwealth v. Artz, 285 Pa. 521, 132 Atl. 575. (13) The welfare of the indigent insane should be considered. La Rocca v. La Rocca, 259 N.Y.S. 569. (14) Judicial power is t......