Commonwealth v. Boynton

Decision Date25 November 1874
PartiesCommonwealth v. Worcester E. Boynton
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Essex. Indictment under the Gen. Sts. c. 165, § 9, charging that the defendant, at a time and place certain "maliciously and without lawful justification, did use a certain instrument, the name of which instrument is to the jurors aforesaid unknown, which said instrument, the said Boynton then and there had and held, by then and there forcing and thrusting the instrument aforesaid into the body and womb of one Georgiana Goff, the said Goff being then and there pregnant with child, with intent thereby, then and there, to cause and procure the miscarriage of the said Goff." Before the jury were sworn, the defendant filed the following motion to quash: "1. Because there is no sufficient allegation that the act charged was committed upon a woman. 2. Because there is no sufficient description of the act, or of the means or instrument used; and no averment that the grand jury were unable to describe the instrument. 3. Because there is no sufficient allegation of intent, it being uncertain from the indictment whether the intent charged was the intent of the defendant or of the other party to the alleged act." This motion was overruled.

The government introduced as a witness Georgiana Goff, who testified substantially to the facts charged, and that she hired and procured the defendant to perform the operation set forth in the indictment. There was other evidence on the part of the prosecution which the government contended corroborated the witness Goff on material points, but which the defendant contended was not such corroboration.

The defendant asked the judge to instruct the jury that "upon the statement of the witness Goff, she was an accomplice in the commission of the crime she describes, and unless her evidence is corroborated in material matters, it is unsafe for a jury to convict upon it, because of its corrupt and suspicious source; and under such circumstances courts deem it their duty to advise the jury to acquit." The judge declined to give this instruction as requested; but instructed the jury upon this point that: "As the witness Goff testified that the defendant did the acts complained of at her request and upon her employment, the jury should carefully consider her connection with those acts in reference to her testimony, and should scrutinize her statements with peculiar care on that account."

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • State v. Cragun
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1934
    ... ... In ... State v. Jones, 115 Iowa 113, 88 N.W. 196, ... 198, citing Bass v. State, 37 Ala. 469; ... Commonwealth v. Wood, 77 Mass. (11 Gray) ... 85, Dunn v. People, 29 N.Y. 523, 86 Am ... Dec. 319, the test is laid down, ... [85 ... Utah ... intent to produce abortion. Commonwealth v ... Wood, 11 Gray [Mass.] 85, 93; Commonwealth ... v. Boynton, 116 Mass. 343, 345; ... Commonwealth v. Follansbee, 155 Mass. 274, ... 277, 29 N.E. 471; State v. Hyer, 39 N.J.L ... The ... ...
  • Commonwealth v. Sinclair
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1907
    ... ... jury. Com. v. Thompson, 159 Mass. 56, 33 N.E. 1111; ... Com. v. Coy, 157 Mass. 200, 214, 216, 32 N.E. 4; ... Com. v. Tibbetts, 157 Mass. 519, 32 N.E. 910; ... Com. v. Follansbee, 155 Mass. 274, 29 N.E. 471; ... Com. v. Corkin, 136 Mass. 429; Com. v ... Brown, 121 Mass. 69; Com. v. Boynton, 116 Mass ... 343; Com. v. Snow, 116 Mass. 47; Com. v ... Jackson, 15 Gray, 187; Com. v. Brown, 14 Gray, ... 419. In Com. v. Wood, 11 Gray, 85, the instrument ... was described only as 'a certain metallic ... instrument'; but the indictment was not objected to on ... this ground. The gist ... ...
  • Weightnovel v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1903
    ...alone. This is a sufficient allegation of the fact that the deceased was a woman. Barker v. State, 40 Fla. 178, 24 So. 69; Commonwealth v. Boynton, 116 Mass. 343. in the third degree is defined by section 2380, Rev. St., as follows: 'The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated w......
  • State v. Ashley
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 22, 1996
    ...with or without her consent, by another person, with intent to produce abortion. Commonwealth v. Wood, 11 Gray, 85, 93; Commonwealth v. Boynton, 116 Mass. 343, 345; Commonwealth v. Follansbee, 155 Mass. 274, 277, 29 N.E. 471; State v. Hyer, 37 N.J. Law, The operative statute upon which the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT