Commonwealth v. Brown

Decision Date05 November 1874
PartiesCommonwealth v. John Brown
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Essex. Indictment, duly averring that the defendant at Lynn on October 1, 1873, and on divers other days and times between that day and the day of the finding of the indictment, kept and maintained a tenement used for the illegal sale and illegal keeping of intoxicating liquors.

The caption was as follows: "Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Essex, to wit: At the Superior Court begun and holden at Salem within and for said county of Essex on the fourth Monday of January in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three."

By the minutes of the clerk upon the docket of January term 1874 it appeared that the indictment was presented by the grand jury and filed in court on February 2, 1874.

The defendant, before the jury were empaneled, moved to quash the indictment, because no offence was set forth therein, and because the offence charged therein was alleged to have been committed after the date and finding of the indictment; and at the trial objected to the introduction of any evidence, for the same reasons. But Lord, J., overruled the objections, and admitted evidence tending to show that the defendant was guilty of the offence charged on October 3, 1873. The defendant, being found guilty, alleged exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

W. D. Northend & C. A. Benjamin, for the defendant.

C. R. Train, Attorney General, for the Commonwealth.

Gray, C. J. Ames & Devens, JJ., absent.

OPINION

Gray, C. J.

The indictment duly charging the commission of an offence at a time before it was found, and the date of its presentment appearing by the record, the error in the caption was immaterial. Commonwealth v. Hines, 101 Mass. 33. Commonwealth v. Smith, 108 Mass. 486.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Warner v. Fuller
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1923
    ...the consideration of the jury under proper instructions. Hildreth v. Martin, 3 Allen, 371;Hayes v. Kelley, 116 Mass. 300, 301, 302;Com. v. Brown, 116 Mass. 339;Proctor v. Old Colony Railroad, 154 Mass. 251, 253, 28 N. E. 13;Commonwealth v. Wakelin, 230 Mass. 567, 576, 120 N. E. 209. The cas......
  • Commonwealth v. Muldoon
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • June 25, 2018
    ...pleaded guilty in 1996, that the text in the body of the indictment dictates the crime charged. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Mass. 339, 340 (1874) ; Commonwealth v. McClaine, 367 Mass. 559, 560 (1975). In those situations where there is "a discordance between the caption and the te......
  • Com. v. McClaine
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1975
    ...the substance of the complaint that governs, and that is determined by the language in the body of the complaint itself. Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Mass. 339, 340 (1874). Commonwealth v. Jarrett, 359 Mass. 491, 495--496, 269 N.E.2d 657 A complaint phrased in the statutory form, as was this ......
  • Brown v. Hudspeth
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • May 8, 1939
    ...Ed., §§ 171, 173, 180, 184. 2 George v. People, 167 Ill. 447, 47 N. E. 741, 742. 3 State v. Robinson, 85 Me. 147, 26 A. 1092; Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Mass. 339; Commonwealth v. Hines, 101 Mass. Commonwealth v. Smith, 108 Mass. 486. See, also, People v. Shaw, 300 Ill. 451, 133 N.E. 208, 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT