Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors

Decision Date26 November 1889
Citation22 N.E. 628,150 Mass. 164
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. CERTAIN INTOXICATING LIQUORS et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

John P Sweeney, for claimant.

A.J. Waterman, Atty. Gen., and H.A. Wyman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.

OPINION

W. ALLEN, J.

Several exceptions taken by the defendant were waived at the argument. We have considered only the two that were not waived.

1. The place to be searched would be sufficiently described in the warrant by the words, as stated in the body of the exceptions, "a certain tenement situate on Essex street, and numbered 136 on said street, in Lawrence, in said county, and occupied by said Libby as a place of common resort kept therein." It is not necessary to refer to the copy of the warrant itself, sent up with the exceptions, in which the description is "a certain tenement, to-wit, a certain dwelling-house, situate," etc.

2. The prayer for a ruling that Libby, the alleged keeper of the place, could not legally use or keep for use the pool tables seized, and found by the jury to be implements of sale used or kept and provided to be used in the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors, without a license, was properly refused. The fact that he could not lawfully keep them for gain had no tendency to show that he did not unlawfully keep them as implements of sale. Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Schwartz
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • December 12, 1923
    ... ... John Schwartz ... Indictment ... for possession of intoxicating liquors contrary to the ... provisions of the Act of March 27, 1923, P. L. 34, Before ... ...
  • Rose v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1909
    ...Twenty-Five Packages, etc., 38 Vt. 387;Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors, 146 Mass. 509, 16 N. E. 298;Commonwealth v. Intox. Liquors, 150 Mass. 164, 22 N. E. 628;State v. Burke, 66 Me. 127;In re Liquors, 16 R. I. 60, 11 Atl. 773. In State v. Thompson, supra, the place was describ......
  • Rose v. The State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1909
    ... ... Burns 1908), ... to procure the seizure and destruction of certain ... intoxicating liquors. Such proceedings were had that final ... State v. Gerhardt, supra; ... Commonwealth v. Wallace (1856), 73 Mass ... 222; State v. Hurley (1867), 54 Me. 562; ... ...
  • E.J. Fitzwilliam Co. Inc. v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 4, 1927
    ...decided. Those decisions are here affirmed. See, also, Commonwealth v. Adams, 160 Mass. 310,35 N. E. 351, and Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, 150 Mass. 164, 22 N. E. 628. A finding of fact of that nature, in the absence of a report of the evidence, cannot be pronounced impossible or b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT