Commonwealth v. Connor
| Decision Date | 05 December 1891 |
| Citation | 29 N.E. 204,155 Mass. 134 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. CONNOR. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
A.E. Pillsbury and Geo. C. Traves, for the Commonwealth.
N.P Moulton and H.T. Bartlett, for defendant.
The complaint addressed "to the justice of the second district court of Essex" purports to have been "received and sworn to *** before said court." The jurat is signed, "William Smeath, special justice of said court." The warrant annexed to the complaint bears the seal of the court, and not the personal seal of William Smeath. The summons recites that complaint has been made "before our second district court of Essex," and also bears the seal of the court. The defendant moved in that court to quash the complaint, because it did not appear that when the complaint was received and summons issued the justice of the court was sick, interested, absent, or otherwise disabled, or had requested the special justice to sit or act, or that the office of justice was vacant, the motion concluding with the argumentative allegation "And so it does not appear that said complaint was received, the summons issued, or any proceedings had before any magistrate having authority or jurisdiction. " This motion must have called the attention of the district court to the objection urged against its jurisdiction, but no statement was inserted in the record to the effect that the court was not in session when the complaint was received, or that any fact existed which gave the special justice authority to hold a session of the court. The motion was renewed in the superior court, and no amendment of the record was there offered. From this we feel bound to infer that the complaint was received and the warrant and summons issued when the court was in session. The authority of the special justice to receive complaints and issue warrants must be derived either from the statute which provides that he may do so "when the court is not in session," (St.1888, c. 193; Pub.St. c. 154, § 22,) or from his power to hold a session of the court. The latter power exists only under special circumstances pointed out in the statutes, (Pub.St. c. 154, § 25,) and which must be stated on the record, (Com. v. Fay, 151 Mass. 380 24 N.E. 201.) The motion does not allege that the court was in session when the complaint was received, but as by our construction that fact appears from the record, and as the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Dunn
... ... premises searched are not his own property or under his ... control or direction. (Gray v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky ... 610, 249 S.W. 769; Commonwealth v. Tucker, 189 Mass ... 457, 76 N.E. 127, 7 L. R. A., N. S., 1056; Findley v ... State (Okla. Cr.), ... Cr. R. 337; State v. Alford, 142 Mo.App ... 412, 127 S.W. 109. See, also, State v. Rose, 125 La ... 1080, 52 So. 165; Commonwealth v. Connor, 155 Mass ... 134, 29 N.E. 204; Porter v. State, 62 Fla. 79, 56 ... So. 406; Wolfe v. Abbott, 54 Colo. 531, 131 P. 386.) ... It is, therefore, ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Andler
...affected the jurisdiction of the court and properly might be raised at a later time. G. L. c. 278, §§ 17 and 34; Commonwealth v. Connor, 155 Mass. 134, 29 N. E. 204. The point that the complaint sets forth no crime known to the law has not been raised or argued at the bar. Nevertheless it o......
-
Potts v. State
... ... Cockrill, 62 Cal.App. 22, 216 P. 78; Cockrill v ... People of California, 268 U.S. 258, 45 S.Ct. 490, 69 ... L.Ed. 944; Commonwealth v. Cooper, 264 Mass. 378, ... 162 N.E. 733, 734. In the last case cited the court says: ... "Here was a presentment by the grand jury which set out ... proceedings. The court of its own motion would be bound to ... take notice of it. Commonwealth v. Connor, 155 Mass ... 134, 29 N.E. 204; Commonwealth v. Andler, 247 Mass ... 580, 582, 142 N.E. 921 ... The amendment offered and allowed was not 'in ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Brown
... ... sitting at the time when it was actually laid before him. The ... warrant properly bore test of the justice of the court, as ... required by St.1888, c. 415, amending Pub.St. c. 154,§ 30 ... The motions were properly overruled. Com. v. Fay, ... 151 Mass. 380, 24 N.E. 201; Com. v. Connor, 155 ... Mass ... ...