Commonwealth v. Hicks
Decision Date | 23 September 1904 |
Citation | 82 S.W. 265,118 Ky. 637 |
Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. HICKS. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Graves County.
"To be officially reported."
Ulysus Hicks was indicted as an accessory before the fact to the suicide of another, and from an order directing a verdict in favor of defendant the commonwealth appeals. Affirmed.
W. H Hester, N. B. Hays, and L. Mix, for the Commonwealth.
Ulysus Hicks was indicted by the grand jury of Graves county charged with being accessory before the fact to the self-murder, or suicide, of one Chris Haggard. A trial resulted in the court's sustaining a motion of the accused for a peremptory instruction to find him not guilty made at the close of the commonwealth's testimony. To review this judgment this appeal is prosecuted under section 337 of the Criminal Code.
The evidence for the commonwealth was substantially as follows Tom Sears testified that he was standing at the corner of Hunt's drug store, when Hicks came along, and smiled, and said: Shortly afterwards, he met the accused, who told him that he had obtained the morphine, and also that he had delivered it to Haggard. After the death of Haggard, Hicks told the witness of a conversation which took place between himself, Haggard, and one Arnett, on the Saturday night before the purchase of the morphine, in which Haggard said that would be the last night that they would ever be together. Mrs. Lizzie Hicks, a sister of Haggard, and a relative by marriage of the accused, testified that, on Wednesday preceding the death of Haggard, the accused offered to bet her that Chris Haggard would not be alive until Saturday night. Ben Hunt, the druggist, testified that he sold the accused half a drachm of morphine, which he said he was purchasing for a young man by the name of Haggard. Mrs. Lucy Hicks, another sister of Haggard, and also a relative to the accused by marriage, testified to the following conversation between the accused and Haggard: ' At the time of this conversation the witness said her brother Chris was playing the guitar, and Dr. A. A. Hurt testified that, on the Saturday night of the week in which the morphine was purchased by the accused, he was called to the bedside of Chris Haggard. The witness said: To the question: "Did you ever succeed in arousing him?" the witness said: The witness testified that Haggard died from the effects of opium, or morphine. Mrs. Lucy Hicks being recalled, stated that, after the burial of Haggard, the accused said that he knew more about Chris' troubles than anybody, but would never tell it.
The crime with which the accused stood charged is, we believe, a somewhat novel one, certainly in Kentucky. Blackstone, in his Commentaries (volume 4, p. 189), says: In Bishop's New Criminal Law (section 1187) it is said ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Petry
...§ 5180 (1889) (see State v. Bogue, 52 Kan. 79, 86-87, 34 P. 410, 412 (1893)); Ky.Stat. § 1128 (1903) (see Commonwealth v. Hicks, 118 Ky. 637, 642, 82 S.W. 265, 266 (1904); La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 14:24 (West) (1974) (see State v. McAllister, La., 366 So.2d 1340 (1978)); Me.Rev.Stat.Ann., Tit. 17......
-
Kevorkian v. Thompson
...70 Mo. 412 [(1979)]; Commonwealth v. Bowen, 13 Mass. 356 [(1816)]; or Commonwealth v. Mink, 123 Mass. 422 [(1877)]; Commonwealth v. Hicks, 118 Ky. 637 (82 S.W. 265) [(1904)]; Burnett v. People, 204 Ill. 208 (68 N.E. 505, 66 L.R.A. 304) [(1903)]; Blackburn v. State, 23 Ohio St. 146 In the la......
-
Standefer v. United States, 79-383
...§ 5180 (1889) (see State v. Bogue, 52 Kan. 79, 86-87, 34 P. 410, 412 (1893)); Ky.Stat. § 1128 (1903) (see Commonwealth v. Hicks, 118 Ky. 637, 642, 82 S.W. 265, 266 (1904); Miss.Code § 1026 (1906) (see Fleming v. State, 142 Miss. 872, 880-881, 108 So. 143, 144-145 (1926)); Mont.Penal Code An......
-
Reed v. Commonwealth
...or tried, unless otherwise provided in this chapter." In construing the statute supra, this court said, in Commonwealth v. Hicks, 26 Ky. Law Rep. 511, 82 S. W. 265, 118 Ky. 637: "The very object of the statute is to make the punishment of the accessory entirely independent of the conviction......
-
What Zombies Can Teach Law Students: Popular Text Inclusion in Law and Literature
...for involuntary manslaughter where the defendant provided a weapon to an intoxicated person who shot himself); Commonwealth v. Hicks, 82 S.W. 265 (Ky. 1904) (affirming the conviction of an accessory to suicide); Nicholson ex rel. Gollot v. State, 672 So. 2d 744 (Miss. 1996) (affirming that ......
-
What about legalized assisted suicide?
...(finding inciter to suicide guilty of murder when causal connection between incitement and death established); and Commonwealth v. Hicks, 82 S.W. 265 (Ky. 1904) (finding accessory to suicide before the fact guilty of murder as principal in the second (16) But see, State v. Marti, 290 N.W.2d......