Commonwealth v. Kirshen
| Decision Date | 26 February 1907 |
| Citation | 80 N.E. 2,194 Mass. 151 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. KIRSHEN. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
John S. Richardson, Asst. Dist. Atty., for the Commonwealth.
Wm. H H. Emmons, for defendant.
This is a complaint for keeping open a workshop on the Lord's Day for the purpose of doing business therein. The case was submitted to the jury on agreed facts and a verdict of guilty was returned by direction of the court. The defendant excepted to the ruling thus made, and to the refusal of the court to rule as requested that he could not be convicted on the agreed facts. The case comes here on report: If, on the agreed facts the defendant is guilty, then the verdict is to stand, otherwise the verdict is to be set aside and judgment entered for the defendant.
The fact that the defendant 'conscientiously believes that the seventh day of the week ought to be observed as the Sabbath, and actually refrains from secular business and labor on that day' is not a defense in a case like this. Com. v. Starr, 144 Mass. 359, 11 N.E. 533; Com v. Has, 122 Mass. 40. It is plain on the agreed facts that he was doing business in a workshop as charged in the complaint. The defendant contends however, that he did not keep the worshop open within the meaning of the statute. He opened the workshop to allow those who desired to do so to go in and work, and nine men and one woman out of the nine men and twelve women regularly employed went in and worked during the day, and at the close of their work he opened the workshop again to allow them to leave. In the interval all of the doors including the one by which these persons entered and left were kept locked, and no other person was allowed to enter the room. A shop, warehouse or workhouse may be kept open so as to come within the prohibition of the statute without being kept 'wide open'; or kept open in the same manner and for the same purposes in which and for which it is kept open for business on week days. In the present case, though the workshop was closed to the public, it was kept open so far as to allow such of the defendant's employés as chose, to enter and work therein. As to them the worshop was kept open for business though locked against all others. The defendant would not be liable for performing secular business and labor on the Lord's Day if he disturbed no other person thereby and conscientiously believed that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crown Kosher Super Market of Mass., Inc. v. Gallagher
...refrains from secular business on that day. Commonwealth v. Has, supra, 122 Mass. 40. To the same effect see Commonwealth v. Kirshen, 1907, 194 Mass. 151, 80 N.E. 2; Commonwealth v. Starr, 1887, 144 Mass. 359, 11 N.E. Much is made by the defendant of the following extract from the opinion o......
-
Gowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc Two Guys From v. Ginley Braunfeld v. Brown, HARRISON-ALLENTOW
...1958, c. 136, § 6, Commonwealth v. Has, 1877, 122 Mass. 40; Commonwealth v. Starr, 1887, 144 Mass. 359, 11 N.E. 533; Commonwealth v. Kirshen, 1907, 194 Mass. 151, 80 N.E. 2; Vernon's Mo.Stat.Ann., 1953, § 563.700; N.J.Stat.Ann., 1953, § 2A:171—4; McKinney's N.Y.Laws, Pen.Law, § 2144, People......
-
Anderson v. Sec'y of Commonwealth
...upon the efficacy of local acceptance is a valid police regulation. Commonwealth v. Has, 122 Mass. 40, 42;Commonwealth v. Kirshen, 80 N. E. 2, 194 Mass. 151,10 Ann. Cas. 948;O'Brien v. Shea, 95 N. E. 99, 208 Mass. 528, 534, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 1030;Commonwealth v. Nickerson, 128 N. E. 273, 236......
-
Anderson v. Secretary of Commonwealth
...is made dependent upon the efficacy of local acceptance is a valid police regulation. Commonwealth v. Has, 122 Mass. 40 , 42. Commonwealth v. Kirshen, 194 Mass. 151 O'Brien v. Shea, 208 Mass. 528 , 534. Commonwealth v. Nickerson, 236 Mass. 281 , 305. G.L.c. 136, Section 7. It follows that t......