Commonwealth v. Lydon, SJC–12289
| Decision Date | 26 May 2017 |
| Docket Number | SJC–12289 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. David LYDON. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Jeffrey A. Garland , Committee for Public Counsel Services, for the defendant.
Helle Sachse , Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.
The defendant, David Lydon, appeals from an order denying his motion for credit for time being served in a house of correction for one set of offenses, while he was awaiting trial and sentencing in the Superior Court on a second, unrelated set of offenses. The Appeals Court affirmed the denial of the motion in a unpublished memorandum and order issued pursuant to its rule 1:28, see Commonwealth v. Lydon , 90 Mass.App.Ct. 1118, 65 N.E.3d 31 (2016), and this court granted further appellate review. Although the defendant is not entitled as of right to the credit he seeks, we recognize that in appropriate circumstances a judge has discretion to impose a concurrent State prison sentence nunc pro tunc to the commencement of a house of correction sentence then being served. Because the judge did not consider whether to exercise his discretion in that regard, we vacate the order, and remand for further consideration.
Discussion . While the defendant was on probation for various drug offenses (Roxbury charges), he was arrested and arraigned in the District Court for three new robbery offenses, for which he later was indicted and arraigned in the Superior Court (Dorchester charges). About five weeks after his arrest on the Dorchester charges, the defendant stipulated to violation of the conditions of his probation, was sentenced on the Roxbury charges, and began serving a six-month committed sentence in the house of correction. One hundred and thirty-two days later (while he was serving the Roxbury sentence), he pleaded guilty to the Dorchester charges, and was given a committed sentence to State prison "forthwith and notwithstanding" the Roxbury sentence. The sentencing judge credited against the Dorchester sentence the thirty-six days the defendant had been held before sentencing on the Roxbury charges, but denied the defendant's motion for additional credit for the 132 days he already had served on the existing Roxbury sentence.
The defendant does not argue that he was entitled as of right to a 132–day jail credit on the Dorchester sentence. Instead, his claim is that a judge has discretion to authorize such credit in these circumstances for two reasons: first, under Commonwealth v. Ridge , 470 Mass. 1024, 1025, 26 N.E.3d 157 (2015), a judge has discretion to award jail credit directly; and, second, a judge has discretion to effectively authorize a credit by imposing a concurrent sentence in a separate case nunc pro tunc to the commencement of the prior sentence. See Commonwealth v. Barton , 74 Mass. App. Ct. 912, 914, 908 N.E.2d 794 (2009). We reject the first contention, but agree with the second point.
1. Direct jail credit . Ridge , supra , does not support the defendant's claim that a direct award of jail credit is discretionary in these circumstances. In Ridge , the defendant was held in lieu of bail on two sets of unrelated charges: one set in Plymouth County, and the other set in Norfolk County. He was sentenced first in Norfolk County, and was given credit on that sentence for the period of pretrial detainment. When he was sentenced a year later in Plymouth County to time concurrent with the Norfolk sentence, he failed to seek jail credit for the same period of pretrial detention. In that circumstance, the court held that "had the defendant requested credit for his pretrial detention at the time of the Plymouth County sentencing, the sentencing judge plainly would have had the power to accede to or to deny the request." Ridge , 470 Mass. at 1025, 26 N.E.3d 157. Ridge did not involve credit "against [one sentence] for the time [a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Commonwealth v. Lys
...to credit or discredit the defendant's affidavits, even in the absence of an affidavit from plea counsel. See Commonwealth v. Lydon, 477 Mass. 1013, 1015, 75 N.E.3d 1116 (2017) (remanding when "judge did not recognize his discretionary authority"); Commonwealth v. Harris, 443 Mass. 714, 728......
-
Commonwealth v. Santana
...and the prisoner is discharged at the expiration of his [State prison] sentence’ " (quotation omitted). Commonwealth v. Lydon, 477 Mass. 1013, 1015, 75 N.E.3d 1116 (2017), quoting Dale v. Commissioner of Correction, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 247, 249, 457 N.E.2d 652 (1983). See Dale, supra at 248-2......
-
Commonwealth v. Lindberg
...to give credit for time spent in a secure DYS facility nunc pro tunc against the adult sentence, see generally Commonwealth v. Lydon, 477 Mass. 1013, 75 N.E.3d 1116 (2017), as the issue was not raised in the trial court. See Lucret, supra at 630, 792 N.E.2d 141.Order denying motion to corre......
-
Commonwealth v. Smith
...a credit by imposing a concurrent sentence in a separate case nunc pro tunc to the commencement of the prior sentence." Commonwealth v. Lydon, 477 Mass. 1013, 1014 (2017), citing Commonwealth v. Barton, 74 Mass. App. Ct. 912, 914 (2009). Thus, ordering that the three sentences run concurren......