Commonwealth v. Reading Sav. Bank
Decision Date | 10 July 1884 |
Citation | 137 Mass. 431 |
Parties | Commonwealth, by Commissioners of Savings Banks, v. Reading Savings Bank. Arthur W. Austin, petitioner |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Argued November 21, 1883 [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]
Upon an application made by the commissioners of savings banks, under the St. of 1866, c. 192, § 5, the Reading Savings Bank had been enjoined from the further continuance of its business, and receivers had been appointed to take possession of its property and effects, for the purpose of settling its affairs.
On February 17, 1882, Arthur W. Austin filed a petition in the case, alleging the following facts:
On November 29, 1871, one David F. Weston conveyed in mortgage certain land in Reading to the Reading Savings Bank, by a deed in the usual form of a power of sale mortgage, and containing a covenant that the grantor was lawfully seised in fee simple of the granted premises, and that they were free from all incumbrances. This deed was drawn and witnessed by, and acknowledged before, C. P. Judd, who was at that time a trustee of said bank. The consideration expressed in the deed was $ 5000, and it was given to secure a promissory note of that amount.
On May 14, 1878, the bank, by its treasurer, Nathan P. Pratt, assigned the mortgage and note and debt to the petitioner, and received, as consideration for the same, the principal and interest then due. The interest on said note was paid to the petitioner to November 1, 1878, by said bank, and no longer. On April 30, 1879, the petitioner took quiet, peaceable, and unopposed possession of said land for the purpose of foreclosing said mortgage, on account of a breach of condition therein contained, namely, the non-payment of principal and interest, and on May 5, 1879, the receivers of the bank took possession of the land, claiming so to do by virtue of a mortgage for $ 1550 on the land, alleged to have been given by Weston to the bank, dated May 16, 1870. The assignment to the petitioner was made with the full assurance of the treasurer of the bank that there was no prior incumbrance.
The prayer of the petition was that the mortgage of $ 1550 be declared not to take precedence of the petitioner's mortgage; and, if it did take precedence, that the petitioner be allowed to redeem the same.
On April 11, 1882, the petitioner filed a supplemental petition, alleging that on or about May 14, 1878, Nathan P. Pratt, the treasurer of the Reading Savings Bank, applied to the petitioner to purchase and take a transfer of the $ 5000 mortgage given by Weston, and of the note secured thereby, and showed to the petitioner, at his request, a vote of the trustees of the bank, authorizing the treasurer to discharge, assign, and release all mortgages belonging to the bank; that thereupon it was agreed between the petitioner and Pratt, as treasurer, that the bank should execute and deliver an assignment of said mortgage deed, and transfer said note to the petitioner, upon payment by him to the bank of a sum equal to the principal and interest then due on the note; that the petitioner paid said sum to the bank, and the bank executed and delivered to the petitioner an assignment, and a transfer of the note; and that it appeared that the execution of the assignment was of doubtful validity, and might be insufficient to pass the legal title to the land.
The prayer of this petition was, that the receivers be ordered to reform the assignment, by executing and delivering to the petitioner a sufficient assignment; and for further relief.
Annexed to this petition were copies of the assignment, and of the mortgage note, as follows:
This assignment purported to be acknowledged before a justice of the peace, on May 14, 1878, by "Nathan P. Pratt, treasurer, in his official capacity," as "his free act and deed," and to be recorded on March 25, 1879.
"$ 5000.
Reading, November 29, 1871.
For value received, on demand, I promise to pay to the order of the Reading Savings Bank, a corporation, five thousand dollars, with interest at the rate of seven and three tenths per cent per annum, payable semiannually until said principal is paid.
On the back of the note was written:
The receivers appeared and filed an answer, admitting the making of both the mortgages by Weston to the bank; and alleging that said mortgages were the property of the bank and of the receivers. They admitted that they had taken possession under the first mortgage, and for the purposes alleged in the petition, and that they intended to apply the rents and profits to the last mortgage or other indebtedness of Weston to the bank. They alleged that the first mortgage was a valid and outstanding security, and that the debt secured thereby had in no part been paid. They denied that Pratt had any power or authority vested in him to sell or assign said mortgage or said note; but alleged that whatever was done by Pratt was done without the knowledge or consent of the trustees or board of investment of the bank, and that no money received by Pratt from the petitioner ever came into the possession of the bank, and that no title or right came to the petitioner by reason of any acts of Pratt done in the premises; and that all his acts were unlawfully and fraudulently done for the purpose of defrauding the bank; and prayed that the petitioner be ordered to reassign said mortgage to them, to be held by them in their capacity as receivers.
The case was heard by W. Allen J., who found the following facts:
The Reading Savings Bank was incorporated by the St. of 1869, c. 393, "with all the powers and privileges, and subject to all the duties, liabilities, and restrictions, set forth in all general laws which now are or may hereafter be in force in this Commonwealth, relating to institutions for savings."
The by-laws of the bank provided that the officers of the corporation should be a president, a vice-president, a treasurer who should also be the secretary, and a board of trustees thirteen in number; and that there should be a board of investment consisting of three persons. The duties of the secretary and treasurer, prescribed by the by-laws, were as follows:
Nathan P. Pratt, the secretary and treasurer of the Reading Savings Bank, offered to sell the $ 5000 mortgage and note to the petitioner, saying that the mortgage was a first or a bottom mortgage, and that it was so good that the bank, which then expected a panic, would wish to buy it back again, and to this the petitioner assented; and for that reason the petitioner...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Comm'r of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.
...139 Mass. 5, 10, 29 N. E. 63. Compare Amherst Bank v. Root, 2 Metc. 533, 540, 544;Holden v. Hoyt, 134 Mass. 181, 184;Commonwealth v. Reading Savings Bank, 137 Mass. 431, 438. However that may be, we go no further than to decide that the record in the cast at bar must be taken to be true and......
-
McCarthy v. Brockton Nat. Bank
... ... received no profits. Reed v. Home Savings Bank, 130 ... Mass. 443 ... Commonwealth v. Reading Savings Bank, ... 137 Mass. 431. Schleifer v. Worcester North Savings ... Institution, ... ...
-
Schleifer v. Worcester North Sav. Inst
...bank was held liable for malicious prosecution. It is bound by a false certificate of its secretary as to its records. Commonwealth v. Reading Savings Bank, 137 Mass. 431. The case of Stoneman v. Fox Film Corp., 295 Mass. 419, 4 N.E.2d 63, 107 A.L.R. 989, is plainly distinguishable. There, ......
-
Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, N.A. & C.R. Co.
... ... 125 ... The ... Kentucky National Bank ... 18 ... The ... Louisville Banking Company ... 55 ... 'Be ... it enacted by the general assembly of the commonwealth ... of Kentucky: ... '1 ... That the Louisville, New Albany & ... Town of Springport v. Teutonia Sav. Bank, 75 N.Y ... 397, Town of Venice v. Woodruff, 62 N.Y. 462, 467; ... 595; Railroad Co. v. Schuyler, ... 34 N.Y. 30; Com. v. Reading Sav. Bank, 137 Mass ... 431; Montaignac v. Shitta, 15 App.Cas. 357 ... ...