Commonwealth v. Ross
| Decision Date | 01 March 1924 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH v. ROSS. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Exceptions from Superior Court, Suffolk County; Elias B. Bishop, Judge.
John Robert Ross was found guilty of polygamy, and brings exceptions. Exceptions overruled.
Defendant in prosecution for polygamy was not entitled to have a verdict of not guilty returned, on the ground that the second marriage charged was entered into more than six years before the finding and return of the indictment; it appearing that defendant continued thereafter to cohabit with the second wife and within six years before the finding of the indictment under G. L. c. 272, s 15.
The purpose of G. L. c. 207, s 6, is to provide against the illegitimacy of children and to protect the public interest, and it did not repeal or modify chapter 272, s 15, making polygamy a criminal offense.
Where case was submitted on agreed facts and no question of law was involved, action of the court in directing a verdict of guilty was without error.
Maurice Caro, Asst. Dist. Atty., of Boston, for the commonwealth.
Killion, Dimento & Mitchell, of Boston, for defendant.
This is an indictment for polygamy. At the trial the case was submitted to the jury on the following agreed facts: The defendant, under the name of John Rosbrough, was married on February 5, 1905, at Boston, to Bessie Robinson, who obtained a divorce from him in Chicago in the year 1911; they were remarried at Louisville, Kentucky, in 1912 and lived together for a short time. The defendant was married to Gertrude Traynor on January 11, 1916; they lived together as husband and wife in Boston until some time in August, 1922, when she learned of his previous marriage to Bessie Robinson and left him, and has not since lived with him. Bessie Robinson obtained a divorce from him in Texas on March 14, 1918. Under the laws of that state either party is free to remarry after the final decree is entered. The foregoing is all the evidence submitted. The defendant filed a written motion that a verdict of not guilty be directed in his favor; this motion was denied and the defendant excepted. He also excepted to the refusal of the court to give certain requests for instructions; to the ruling that the divorce granted to Bessie Robinson was not a defense; and to the direction to the jury that a verdict of guilty should be returned.
[1] The indictment charges the crime set forth in G. L. c. 272, § 15, that--
The defendant ‘having a lawful wife living, to wit, Bessie Robinson Rosbrough, did at Boston, unlawfully marry and have for his wife one Gertrude Traynor, after which the said John Robert Ross * * * did while said Bessie Robinson Rosbrough was still living, during the six years next before the finding of this indictment, unlawfully cohabit and continued to cohabit in said Boston with the said Gertrude Traynor.’
The indictment was found in November, 1922, and is drawn in conformity with the second form contained in the schedule of forms of pleading under the heading ‘polygamy’ in G. L. c. 277, § 79. The contention of the defendant that he was entitled to have a verdict of not guilty returned on the ground that the second...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Beneficial Finance Co.
...such an offence the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the date on which the continuing offence ends. Commonwealth v. Ross, 248 Mass. 15, 18, 142 N.E. 791; Commonwealth v. Geagan, 339 Mass. 487, 518--519, 159 N.E.2d 870. The date of the conspiracy indictment is May 8, 1964, ......
-
Com. v. Ries
...itself directly participated in the Kalman transactions (see Commonwealth v. Gardner, 241 Mass. 86, 134 N.E. 638; Commonwealth v. Ross, 248 Mass. 15, 142 N.E. 791; Commonwealth v. Renfrew, 332 Mass. 492, 126 N.E.2d 109; compare Commonwealth v. Moniz, 336 Mass. ----, 143 N.E.2d 196) but he n......
-
Toussie v. United States
...Ala. 103, 23 So. 806, 41 L.R.A. 760 (1898); compare People v. Brady, 257 App.Div. 1000, 13 N.Y.S.2d 789 (1939), with Commonwealth v. Ross, 248 Mass. 15, 142 N.E. 791 (1924). 14. E.g., State v. Dry Fork R. Co., 50 W.Va. 235, 40 S.E. 447 (1901). 15. Richardson v. State, 30 Del. (7 Boyce) 534,......
-
Com. v. Rodriguez
...and as no question of law was involved, the action of the court in "directing verdicts" was without error. See Commonwealth v. Ross, 248 Mass. 15, 19, 142 N.E. 791 (1924). The defendant's reliance on Commonwealth v. Hebert, 379 Mass. 752, 400 N.E.2d 851 (1980), is misplaced, the facts there......