Commonwealth v. Welch

Decision Date21 October 1886
Citation142 Mass. 473,8 N.E. 342
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. WELCH.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

E.J. Sherman, Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.

OPINION

BY THE COURT.

If we assume, in favor of the defendant, that the officer testified that the tumbler which he seized contained intoxicating liquor, his testimony was competent, without producing the liquor or accounting for its absence. Such testimony is not secondary evidence, within the rule that the best evidence must be produced, unless destroyed or otherwise accounted for. Com. v. Blood, 11 Gray, 74; Com. v. Pope, 103 Mass. 440.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT