Commonwealth v. Williams

Decision Date18 May 1894
Citation37 N.E. 371,161 Mass. 442
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. WILLIAMS.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

The indictment charged defendant with stealing a watch, chain, and charm from one Preston O. Sweet. There was evidence that the owner's name was O. Preston Sweet, but that he was also known as Preston O. Sweet, and was as well known by one name as the other. A clerk in a pawnbroker's office testified that the defendant had pawned the watch in question at his office two days after the theft. The defendant requested the court to rule (1) that the jury should return a verdict of not guilty, by reason of a variance, the name of the owner not being proved as laid; (2) that there was no evidence on which the jury could convict. The court refused both requests, and defendant excepted.

COUNSEL

M.J. Sughrue, for the Commonwealth.

Cornelius P. Sullivan and Joseph M. Sullivan, for defendant.

OPINION

FIELD, C.J.

There was evidence that the owner of the property described as stolen was "as well known by the name of Preston O. Sweet as by the name of O. Preston Sweet." The court could not, therefore, rule as matter of law that there was a variance. Com. v. O'Hearn, 132 Mass. 553; Com. v. Gormley, 133 Mass. 580; Com. v. Caponi, 155 Mass. 534, 30 N.E. 82; Com. v. Gould, 158 Mass. 499, 33 N.E. 656. There was evidence for the jury that the watch, chain, and charm had been stolen, and that the defendant was the thief. Com. v. Deegan, 138 Mass. 182. Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Rousseau, 02-P-964 (MA 5/6/2004)
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 6 Mayo 2004
    ...Id. at 123-124, citing Commonwealth v. McGorty, 114 Mass. 299 (1873); Commonwealth v. Deegan, 138 Mass. 182 (1884); Commonwealth v. Williams, 161 Mass. 442 (1894); Commonwealth v. Taylor, 210 Mass. 443 The dissent seeks to submerge these long established principles under what the dissent de......
  • Com. v. Davis
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 25 Enero 1979
    ...as larceny from the person. Commonwealth v. Cronan, 155 Mass. 393, 29 N.E. 639 (1892) (victim felt a "tug"). Commonwealth v. Williams, 161 Mass. 442, 37 N.E. 371 (1894) (victim was "jostled"). Jones v. Commonwealth, 115 Ky. 592, 74 S.W. 263 (1903). Bibb v. Commonwealth, 112 S.W. 401 (Ky.190......
  • Com. v. Taylor
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 5 Enero 1912
    ...210 Mass. 443 97 N.E. 94 COMMONWEALTH v. TAYLOR. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.January 5, 1912 ...          COUNSEL ... [210 Mass. 445] ... McCorty, 114 Mass. 299; ... Commonwealth v. Randall, 119 Mass. 107; ... Commonwealth v. Deegan, 138 Mass. 182; ... Commonwealth v. Williams, 161 Mass. 442, 37 N.E ... 371. See Wigmore on Ev. § 2513. If the larceny had been of ... goods which might have been easily disposed of, while ... ...
  • Commonwealth v. Grace
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 28 Noviembre 1928
    ...given, is presumptive evidence of guilt. Commonwealth v. McGorty, 114 Mass. 299;Commonwealth v. Deegan, 138 Mass. 182;Commonwealth v. Williams, 161 Mass. 442, 37 N. E. 371;Commonwealth v. Taylor, 210 Mass. 443, 444, 97 N. E. 94. [4] 4. The following question was put to the jury by the judge......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT