Compassion in Dying v. State of Wash., C94-119R.
Citation | 850 F. Supp. 1454 |
Decision Date | 03 May 1994 |
Docket Number | No. C94-119R.,C94-119R. |
Parties | COMPASSION IN DYING, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Jane Roe, John Doe, James Poe, Harold Glucksberg, M.D., Abigail Halperin, M.D., Thomas A. Preston, M.D., and Peter Shalit, M.D., Ph.D., Plaintiffs, v. The STATE OF WASHINGTON and Christine Gregoire, Attorney General of Washington, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington |
Kathryn L. Tucker, Perkins Coie, Seattle, WA, for plaintiffs.
William Lee Williams, Attorney General's Office, Health Div., Olympia, WA, for defendants.
Todd Maybrown, Allen & Hansen, Karen E. Boxx, Keller Rohrback, Seattle, WA, for amici.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS COURT is asked to rule as a matter of first impression on the constitutionality of the State of Washington's criminal prohibition against physician-assisted suicide. Specifically, the plaintiffs assert that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees adults who are mentally competent, terminally ill, and acting under no undue influence the right to voluntarily hasten their death by taking a lethal dose of physician-prescribed drugs. Plaintiffs accordingly challenge the constitutionality of RCW 9A.36.060, which makes it a felony to knowingly aid another person in committing suicide. Plaintiffs challenge the statute only insofar as it bans physician-assisted suicide by mentally competent, terminally ill adults who knowingly and voluntarily choose to hasten their death.
The plaintiffs seek both a declaratory judgment striking down the statute as unconstitutional and injunctive relief barring defendants State of Washington and the Washington Attorney General from enforcing the statute. Both plaintiffs and defendants now move for summary judgment.1
The plaintiffs are a coalition of three terminally ill patients, five physicians who treat terminally ill patients, and Compassion in Dying, an organization which provides support, counseling and assistance to mentally competent, terminally ill adults considering suicide.
Jane Roe is a 69-year-old retired pediatrician who has suffered since 1988 from cancer which has now metastasized throughout her skeleton. Although she tried and benefitted temporarily from various treatments including chemotherapy and radiation, she is now in the terminal phase of her disease. In November of 1993, her doctor referred her to hospice care. Only patients with a life expectancy of less than six months are eligible for such care.
Jane Roe has been almost completely bedridden since June of 1993 and experiences constant pain, which becomes especially sharp and severe when she moves. The only medical treatment available to her at this time is medication, which cannot fully alleviate her pain. In addition, she suffers from swollen legs, bed sores, poor appetite, nausea and vomiting, impaired vision, incontinence of bowel, and general weakness.
Jane Roe is mentally competent and wishes to hasten her death by taking prescribed drugs with the help of plaintiff Compassion in Dying. In keeping with the requirements of that organization, she has made three requests for its members to provide her and her family with counseling, emotional support and any necessary ancillary assistance at the time she takes the drugs.
John Doe is a 44-year-old artist dying of AIDS. Since his diagnosis in 1991, he has experienced two bouts of pneumonia, chronic, severe skin and sinus infections, grand mal seizures and extreme fatigue. He has already lost 70% of his vision to cytomegalovirus retinitis, a degenerative disease which will result in blindness and rob him of his ability to paint. His doctor has indicated that he is in the terminal phase of his illness.
John Doe is especially cognizant of the suffering imposed by a lingering terminal illness because he was the primary caregiver for his long-term companion who died of AIDS in June of 1991. He also observed his grandfather's death from diabetes preceded by multiple amputations as well as loss of vision and hearing. Mr. Doe is mentally competent, understands there is no cure for AIDS, and wants his physician to prescribe drugs which he can use to hasten his death.
James Poe is a 69-year-old retired sales representative who suffers from emphysema, which causes him a constant sensation of suffocating. He is connected to an oxygen tank at all times, and takes morphine regularly to calm the panic reaction associated with his feeling of suffocation. Mr. Poe also suffers from heart failure related to his pulmonary disease which obstructs the flow of blood to his extremities and causes severe leg pain. There are no cures for his pulmonary and cardiac conditions, and he is in the terminal phase of his illness. Mr. Poe is mentally competent and wishes to commit suicide by taking physician-prescribed drugs.
The five physician plaintiffs all regularly treat terminally ill patients. Dr. Harold Glucksberg is an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine and practices oncology, the treatment of cancer, at the Pacific Medical Center in Seattle. He has published dozens of articles in medical journals dealing with cancer.
In his declaration to the court, Dr. Glucksberg states:
Cancer usually progresses steadily and slowly. The cancer patient is fully aware of his or her present suffering and anticipates certain future suffering. The terminal cancer patient faces a future that can be terrifying. Near the end, the cancer patient is usually bedridden, rapidly losing mental and physical functions, often in excruciating, unrelenting pain. Pain management at this stage often requires the patient to choose between enduring unrelenting pain or surrendering an alert mental state because the dose of drugs adequate to alleviate the pain will impair consciousness. Many patients will choose one or the other of these options; however, some patients do not want to end their days either racked with pain or in a drug-induced stupor. For some patients pain cannot be managed even with aggressive use of drugs.
Declaration of Harold Glucksberg, M.D., pp. 3-5.
Declaration of John P. Geyman, M.D., pp. 3-5.
Dr. Thomas A. Preston is currently chief of the cardiology unit at Pacific Medical Center in Seattle. He has published numerous articles and books in the field of cardiology, and has received numerous honors for medical teaching and writing. Dr. Preston regularly treats patients dying from cardiopulmonary diseases, a process which can last several months. Dr. Abigail Halperin practices family medicine and occasionally treats patients with terminal illnesses including cancer and AIDS. Dr. Peter Shalit practices general internal medicine; a substantial number of his patients suffer from HIV infection and AIDS. Both Dr. Halperin and Dr. Shalit are also clinical instructors at the University of Washington School of Medicine.
The five physician plaintiffs all state that they have received requests from terminally ill, mentally competent patients in the final stage of their diseases who wished assistance in hastening death. Although their professional judgments have at times dictated that they should assist such patients, they have all been deterred from doing so by the existence of the Washington statute challenged in this case.3
Compassion in Dying is a Washington nonprofit organization which provides information, counseling and assistance free of charge to mentally competent, terminally ill adult patients considering suicide and to the families of such patients.
Compassion in Dying operates under a written protocol and has strict eligibility requirements for the individuals to whom it provides services. Eligible patients must be considered terminally ill in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kevorkian v. Thompson
...permitting the refusal or withdrawal of life support systems for terminally ill individuals". Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington, 850 F.Supp. 1454, 1467 (W.D.Wash.1994). The State of Washington appealed, and the original three-judge appellate panel reversed the district court's deci......
-
Compassion in Dying v. State of Wash.
...phase of his illness. Mr. Poe is mentally competent and wishes to commit suicide by taking physician-prescribed drugs. Compassion In Dying, 850 F.Supp. at 1456-57. The names of the patients are pseudonymous in order to protect their privacy. All three patients died after the case began. Two......
-
People v. Kevorkian
...the State of Washington's criminal prohibition against assisted suicide. The court held in Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 850 F.Supp. 1454, 1461 (W.D.Wash., 1994), 38 that the right of a terminally ill person to the assistance of a physician in committing suicide is analogous to the rig......
-
Washington v. Glucksberg
...seeking a declaration that Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.36.060(1) (1994) is, on its face, unconstitutional. Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 850 F. Supp. 1454, 1459 (WD Wash. 1994).4 The plaintiffs asserted "the existence of a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment which extends t......
-
THE DEATH OF ABORTION: IF ROE V. WADE IS OVERTURNED, CAN THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE BE UPHELD UNDER THE ARGUMENTS USED TO ESTABLISH AN INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE?
...Ann. [section] 70.245.020 (West 2020) (codifying right to physician-assisted suicide in Washington); Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 850 F. Supp. 1454, 1455 (W.D. Wash. 1994), rev'd 49 F.3d 586 (9th Circuit 1995), reh'g en banc, 79 F.3d 790 (9th Circuit) (describing arguments both in sup......
-
Assisted suicide and equal protection: in defense of the distinction between killing and letting die.
...are bound to follow."). (10) Id. at 729, 731. (11) Compassion in Dying II, 79 F.3d at 824; see also Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 850 F. Supp. 1454, 1461 (W.D. Wash. 1994) ("From a constitutional perspective, the court does not believe that a distinction can be drawn between refusing l......
-
Three strikes: is an assisted suicide right out?
...the district court, which had decided there is a fundamental right to assisted suicide. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington, 850 F. Supp. 1454 (W.D. Wash. (15) See infra notes 48-50 and accompanying text. (16) 505 U.S. 833 (1992). (17) 497 U.S. 261 (1990). (18) See infra notes 69-79 ......
-
Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities: 1993-94 developments.
...earlier developments in Kevorkian & Hobbins) (hereinafter Quarterly Report: Winter 1994). (2) Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 850 F. Supp. 1454 (W.D. Wash. 1994), appeal filed No. 943554 (9th Cir. 1994); see also Quarterly Report: Winter 1994, supra note 1, at v-vi. (3) See Compassio......