Comstock v. Grand Rapids

Decision Date31 January 1879
Citation39 Mich. 195
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesPeople ex rel. Everett D. Comstock v. Judge of Superior Court of Grand Rapids

June 18, 1878, Motion Submitted; June 21, 1878, Granted

Mandamus.

Mandamus granted.

G Chase Godwin for relator. If the title of an act is enough to embrace the provisions of an amendatory act, it need not be inquired whether the title of the latter would be, of itself Brandon v. State, 16 Ind. 197; State v. Bowers, 14 Ind. 198; the title of an act need only set forth its purpose in general words, People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 490; an act amending specified sections may affect others not specified, Harrington v. Wands, 23 Mich. 388; People v. Insurance Co., 19 Mich. 392; Conn. Life Ins. Co. v. State, 31 Mich. 17; Swartwout v. R. R., 24 Mich. 389; People v. Hurlbut, 24 Mich. 54; Kurtz v. People, 33 Mich. 279; Cooley's Const. Lim., 142 et seq.

John C. FitzGerald for respondent. The scope of the title of an act cannot be enlarged by construction, Mewherter v. Price, 11 Ind. 199; People v. Hills, 35 N. Y., 449; People v. Mellen, 32 Ill. 181; State v. Wilson, 7 Ind. 516; State v. Kinsella, 14 Minn. 524; Weaver v. Lapsley, 43 Ala. 229; People v. Allen, 42 N. Y., 417; People v. O'Brien, 38 N. Y., 193; Durkee v. Janesville, 26 Wis. 697; Ryerson v. Utley, 16 Mich. 277; Booth v. Eddy, 38 Mich. 245; Fishkill v. Fishkill R. R. Co., 22 Barb. 641.

OPINION

Campbell, C. J.

Relator asks a mandamus to compel the respondent to admit him to the office of Clerk of the Superior Court of Grand Rapids, by receiving his bond and oath of office. This is resisted on the ground that by the old law the clerk of Kent county was made ex officio clerk of that court, and that the new law providing for a separate clerk is invalid.

The alleged reason of its insufficiency is that while the title of the act purports to revise and amend several sections of the old statute and to add several new sections, the particular provision is contained in a section numbered 7, corresponding in number with an old section which is not mentioned in the title.

As was discovered in People ex. rel. Chapoton v. Common Council of Detroit, 38 Mich. 636, it is no uncommon thing in our amendatory legislation to number sections wrongly, or to append new sections to statutes without repealing others of the same numbers, so that duplicate numbers are often found in the same statute. In such case the later section may practically repeal older sections which are not repealed by name. The title to this act, when it refers to revising named sections and adding new sections to the statute has a very undefined field opened to legislation touching the court in question, and we are not prepared to say that because it may be awkwardly framed it is therefore invalid. Its purpose is plain and we think it may be carried out.

The practice of amending by reference to sections instead of by reference to subjects or to the entire statute is one...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • The State v. Doerring
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1906
    ...637; State v. Brown, 41 La. Ann. 771; People v. Hills, 35 N.Y. 449; Doggett v. State, 17 Neb. 143; State v. Babcock, 23 Neb. 128; People v. Judge, 39 Mich. 195; Callahan v. Chipman, 59 Mich. 616; Fenton Yule, 27 Neb. 758; State ex rel. v. Heege, 135 Mo. 112; State ex rel. v. County Court, 1......
  • State ex rel. Harris v. Laughlin
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1882
    ...its title intimates that it will do, it reaches out for something entirely separate and independent.” And in People ex rel. Comstock v. Judge of Superior Court, 39 Mich. 195, a statute similarly entitled, though criticised, was held to be valid; vide also County Commissioners of Dorchester ......
  • Common Council of City of Detroit v. Schmid
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 8, 1901
    ... ... many cases. As early as 1878, in the case of People v ... Judge of Superior Court of Grand Rapids, 39 Mich. 196, ... the question was presented. The act there under consideration ... ...
  • Colorado Farm & Live Stock Co. v. Beerbohm
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1908
    ... ... 346, ... 47 N.E. 675; State v. Jones, 9 Idaho 693, 75 P. 819-826; ... People ex rel. Comstock v. Judge of Superior Court, 39 Mich ... 195; Holden v. Supervisors, 77 Mich. 202, 43 N.W. 970. In ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT