Conley v. Office of Public Defender, Sixth Judicial Dist. of Ark., Pulaski and Perry Counties, 81-1072
| Decision Date | 21 July 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 81-1072,81-1072 |
| Citation | 653 F.2d 1241 |
| Parties | Otha Lee CONLEY, Appellant, v. OFFICE OF the PUBLIC DEFENDER, SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS, PULASKI AND PERRY COUNTIES, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Otha Lee Conley, appellant pro se.
Wilbur C. Bentley, Pros. Atty. and Hugh L. Brown, Deputy Pros. Atty., Little Rock, Ark., for Office of the Public Defender, appellee.
Before ROSS, Circuit Judge, GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
Otha Lee Conley appeals from the district court's 1 order of December 31, 1980, dismissing his civil rights suit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Conley, an inmate at the Arkansas Department of Corrections, alleged in his complaint that: (1) on September 4, 1978, William R. Simpson, a Deputy Public Defender for the Sixth Judicial District of Arkansas, was requested to witness a (police) lineup in which Conley, an indigent person, appeared; (2) the lineup was clearly suggestive and Simpson did nothing to ensure its fairness; (3) Conley was picked by the rape victim as her assailant; (4) Simpson subsequently appeared at plea and arraignment proceedings with Conley but Conley retained other legal counsel for the trial of the case; (5) at trial, Conley challenged the fairness of the September 4 lineup but Simpson testified for the State that the procedures of the lineup were consistent with procedures followed in other lineups; (6) Simpson gave false testimony in a conspiracy to convict appellant Conley of rape. The district court dismissed Conley's complaint. We affirm.
The district court correctly dismissed the petition on the basis of witness immunity. Witnesses are absolutely immune from section 1983 remedy actions arising from their testimony in judicial proceedings. Myers v. Bull, 599 F.2d 863, 866 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 901, 100 S.Ct. 213, 62 L.Ed.2d 138 (1979). Furthermore, the office of the Public Defender for the Sixth Judicial District of Arkansas cannot be liable for the actions of its employees without a showing of direct responsibility. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 375-376, 96 S.Ct. 598, 606-607, 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976). Conley's allegations should be raised in a habeas corpus proceeding in the state courts of Arkansas. Section 1983 does not afford him a remedy.
The district court's dismissal is affirmed.
1 The Honorable William Overton, United States District Judge, Eastern District...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McGhee v. Pottawattamie County, Ia
... ... Olson, Olson Law Office PC, Des Moines, IA, Thomas P. Frerichs, Frerichs ... thereby freeing courts to utilize scarce judicial resources in more beneficial ways." Mesnick v ... Ark. Natural Gas Corp., 321 U.S ... Page 879 ... the judicial process — the overriding public policy justification of freeing the judicial ... Id. at 468. Sixth, Hughes' accounts to police about who picked up ... prosecutors also apply to witnesses."); Conley v. Office of the Pub. Defender, 653 F.2d 1241, ... Linn-Mar Cmty. Sch. Dist ... ...
-
Liebing v. Sand
... ... Lucas , FECR094149 (Linn Cnty., Iowa Dist. Ct.). In October 2013, Lucas was convicted in ... Holdings, was about to be evicted from its office because it owed $9000 for rent. Page 4 When ... The public interest is served by the constitutional rights ... Renshaw from Violating Alan Lucas First and Sixth Amendment rights, including revocation of all ... ) claims against the judges are barred by judicial immunity; and (6) claims against the prison ... can grant specific and conclusive relief." Ark ... AFL-CIO v ... FCC , 11 F.3d 1430, 1435 (8th ... 1992) (same); Conley v ... Office of the Pub ... Def ., 653 F.2d 1241, ... ...
-
Williams v. Hepting
... ... 1737, 68 L.Ed.2d 223 (1981); see Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 ... accorded at common law to witnesses in judicial proceedings, which was based on the need "to ... , civilly or criminally for words spoken in office." See Veeder, Absolute Immunity in Defamation: ... Witness immunity is firmly bottomed in public policy: ... The function of witnesses is ... Office of the Public Defender", 653 F.2d 1241, 1242 (8th Cir.1981) ... \xC2" ... The Courts of Appeals for the Second, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits have applied the rationale ... ...
-
Holt v. Castaneda, 87-5621
... ... the Municipal Court of the North County Judicial District of the County of San Diego, California ... arising from their testimony."); Conley v. Office of the Public Defender, 653 F.2d 1241, ... ...