Connell v. State

Decision Date18 March 1922
Docket Number(No. 2944.)
Citation111 S.E. 545,153 Ga. 151
PartiesCONNELL. v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

(Syllabus by the Court.)

[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED]

[111 S.E. 517]

Error from Superior Court, Wilkinson County; J. B. Park, Judge.

P. T. Connell was convicted of an offense, and be brings error. Affirmed.

John R. Cooper and W. O. Cooper, Jr., both of Macon, for plaintiff in error.

Doyle Campbell, Sol. Gen., and A. Y. Clement, both of Monticello, and Geo. M. Napier, Atty. Gen., and Seward M. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

GILBERT, J. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except FISH, C. J., absent because of sickness.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State v. Bryant
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 11 October 1972
    ...by this Court. Other jurisdictions have considered similar phraseology in defining 'reasonable doubt.' In the case of Connell v. State, 153 Ga. 151(2), 111 S.E. 545, the Georgia Court stated that reasonable doubt is more than a possibility of innocence. A like statement is found in the case......
  • Wright v. State
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 10 March 1937
    ...... jury that the defendant had had carnal knowledge of this. girl, who was under the age of consent. This is true in the. face of the denial of the defendant as to any intercourse. See Smith v. State, 91 Ga. 10, 16 S.E. 378. . .          Under. the decisions of this court in Connell v. State, 153. Ga. 151, 111 S.E. 545, Riley v. State, 153 Ga. 182,. 111 S.E. 729, Cofer v. State, 163 Ga. 878, 137 S.E. 378, and Chapman v. State, 112 Ga. 56(2), 37 S.E. 102, there is apparently little material difference in the. sufficiency of the supporting testimony required in cases. ......
  • Wright v. State, 11670.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • 10 March 1937
    ......668]a reasonable doubt from all the evidence, including the defendant's statement, that of the female alleged to have been raped, and the corroborating evidence, if any, taken together and considered along with the statement of the defendant." See Riley v. State, supra; Connell v. State, 153 Ga. 151, 111 S.E. 545.         8. The evidence tended to show a course of improper conduct between the defendant and female over a period of several weeks, culminating in the automobile ride which led to the discovery of his alleged criminal practices with her. The judge, ......
  • Marshall v. State
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 26 September 1973
    ...214, 215, 109 S.E. 291; Lumpkin v. State, 152 Ga. 229(2), 109 S.E. 664; Merritt v. State, 152 Ga. 405(1), 110 S.E. 160; Connell v. State, 153 Ga. 151(2), 111 S.E. 545; Bruster v. State, 228 Ga. 651(2), 187 S.E.2d 297; Kryder v. State, 57 Ga.App. 200, 201, 194 S.E. 890; Deering v. State, 123......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT