Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 5D01-1817.
| Decision Date | 13 September 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D01-1817.,5D01-1817. |
| Citation | 827 So.2d 318 |
| Parties | CONNER, I, INC., Appellant, v. The WALT DISNEY COMPANY, etc., et al., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
J. Wayne Crosby of J. Wayne Crosby, P. A., Orlando, for Appellant.
David L. Evans of Mateer & Harbert, P. A., Orlando, for Appellee.
ORFINGER, R. B., J.
Conner, I, Inc. sued the Walt Disney Company and Walt Disney World Company (collectively "Disney"), alleging breach of contract, breach of a joint venture agreement, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. On Disney's motion, the trial court dismissed the action with prejudice, concluding that Conner's claims were barred by the statute of frauds. This appeal followed. We affirm.
In its amended complaint, Conner alleged that Disney agreed to enter into a joint venture with Conner, the purpose of which was to replace and operate approximately 400 manufactured housing units located at Disney's Fort Wilderness development. Conner alleged that it was to design, purchase, and install the housing units at Fort Wilderness and then lease the units to Disney for a period of not less than twelve years. Conner also alleged that Fort Wilderness was to be operated as a joint venture, with both parties sharing in the development and operation of the project. While the parties had numerous meetings, and allegedly made various oral commitments, all of which Conner claims it could have performed within twelve months, no written agreements were entered into. Disney eventually developed Fort Wilderness without Conner's participation.
Florida has several statutes of frauds, each dealing with a different type of commercial transaction. Any agreement for the sale of goods for more than $500,1 for the sale of personal property other than goods for a price of more than $5,000,2 or for the lease of goods for lease payments in excess of $1,000,3 must be in writing to be enforceable. Under the express terms of these statutes, a writing is required regardless of when performance can be completed. One or more of these statutes would bar Conner's claims depending on how one characterizes the transaction. Similarly, if Conner's business arrangement with Disney is construed as involving the sale or lease of real property, it is clear that it was intended to last more than one year, and is therefore barred under section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1996).
In ruling on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the trial court must accept the allegations of the complaint as true and in a light most favorable to the plaintiff. Fox v. Prof'l Wrecker Operators of Fla., Inc., 801 So.2d 175, 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Because the sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law, we review the matter de novo. Id. Generally, the statute of frauds is an affirmative defense that cannot be raised in a motion to dismiss unless the complaint affirmatively shows the conclusive applicability...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Farm Credit of Northwest Florida v. Easom Peanut Co.
...the price for its peanuts exceeded $500. Therefore, to be enforceable, the contract had to be in writing. Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 827 So.2d 318, 319 (Fla.App.2002). And a party may not circumvent the requirements of the statute of frauds by alleging promissory estoppel. See Shor......
-
Oj Commerce, LLC v. Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc.
...are merely indirect claims for breach of contract and are therefore barred by the statute of frauds. See Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co. , 827 So.2d 318, 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ("To the extent that [Plaintiff] attempts to assert tort claims, they are likewise barred, as they flow from t......
-
Mark Andrew of Palm Beaches v. Gmac Comm. Mortg.
...of making of the oral contract may have had no intention of performing it." (quotations omitted)); Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 827 So.2d 318, 318 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.2002) (dismissing negligent misrepresentation claim where oral contract was unenforceable); Broward Nat'l Bank of Fort ......
-
Innova Inv. Grp. v. Vill. of Key Biscayne
...Comm., LLC v. Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc., 359 F. Supp. 3d 1163, 1172 n.6 (S.D. Fla. 2018) (quoting Conner, I, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 827 So. 2d 318, 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)). As discussed below, the Third Amended Complaint and the exhibits attached affirmatively show that Counts I and ......