Connor v. Hall

• Citation: 16 S.E. 266,91 Ga. 62
• Parties: CONNOR v. HALL et al.
• Decision Date: 31 October 1892
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court

16 S.E. 266

91 Ga. 62

CONNOR v. HALL et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia

October 31, 1892

Syllabus by the Court.

Where a person who was cited to appear before the recorder's court of the city of Atlanta to show cause why he should not abate a nuisance appeared, and, among other defenses, pleaded to the jurisdiction of the court, and this plea was overruled, and the case tried upon the merits, and he was ordered to remove the nuisance, and he thereupon took the case to the superior court by certiorari, in which he did not assign error upon the judgment overruling his plea to the jurisdiction, but complained of the other alleged errors, and his certiorari was overruled, and the judgment overruling it was affirmed by the supreme court, the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to grant him an injunction to prevent the city marshal from executing the judgment by removing the nuisance. Brown, Jur. §18, and note 2.

Error from superior court, Fulton county; R. H. CLARK, Judge.

Action for injunction by Mary Connor against L. H. Hall and others. Defendants had judgment, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.

Simmons & Corrigan, for plaintiff in error.

Speairs & Roan and J. A. Anderson, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.