Connors v. N.Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Decision Date | 10 February 2011 |
Citation | 81 A.D.3d 479,916 N.Y.S.2d 92 |
Parties | In re Patrick J. CONNORS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent-Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Jones Hirsch Connors & Bull, P.C., New York (Kerry J. Kaltenbach of counsel), for appellant.
Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York (Patrick J. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered October 19, 2009, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking, inter alia, to vacate respondent's determination that petitioner was guilty of driving at an excessive rate of speed, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner is not entitled to dismissal of the subject charges on the basis that the New York City Police Department (NYPD) failed to fully comply with a subpoena. It is well established that the CPLR and CPL are not binding on respondent and the procedures set forth therein do not apply to proceedings conducted by it unless specifically authorized ( see15 NYCRR 123.1). In any event, the NYPD produced the relevant "speed detection device" petitioner sought, namely, the trained and qualified officer who physically observed petitioner traveling nearly 100 miles per hour in a 50-miles-per-hour zone. The NYPD also produced a certified copy of the document showing that the speedometer in the officer's vehicle, which he used to pace petitioner's speed, was properly calibrated and functioning properly ( see People v. Olsen, 22 N.Y.2d 230, 232, 292 N.Y.S.2d 420, 239 N.E.2d 354 [1968]; Matter of Stamos v. Appeals Bd. of N.Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 309 A.D.2d 572, 765 N.Y.S.2d 342 [2003], lv. denied 1 N.Y.3d 505, 775 N.Y.S.2d 782, 807 N.E.2d 895 [2003] ).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Serrano
...bureau are not subject to the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law.” See also, In re Connors v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 81 A.D.3d 479, 479–80, 916 N.Y.S.2d 92 (1st Dept.2011) (“It is well established that the CPLR and CPL are not binding on respondent and the proc......
-
Trabanco v. City of N.Y.
... ... v. Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y., 70 N.Y.2d 233, 240, 519 N.Y.S.2d 539, ... New York City Dept. of Educ., 30 A.D.3d 218, 817 N.Y.S.2d 20 [2006] ... ...
-
People v. Das
...that presentation, sufficient proof was before the trial court to support the speeding conviction. Connors v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles 81 A.D.3d 479 (1st Dept. 2011); Stamos v Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 309 A.D.2d 572 (1st Dept, 2003)......
-
Success, LLC v. Stonehenge Capital Co., LLC
... ... v. Motor Car Funding, 257 A.D.2d 287, 291-292, 690 ... ...