Consolidated Stage Co. v. Corporation Commission, 4849
Decision Date | 11 July 1947 |
Docket Number | 4849 |
Citation | 182 P.2d 937,66 Ariz. 75 |
Parties | CONSOLIDATED STAGE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION et al |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Maricopa County; Howard C. Speakman Judge.
Suit by Consolidated Stage Company against the Corporation Commission of the State of Arizona and Amos A. Betts and others, members of the Corporation Commission of the State of Arizona, to review orders of the Corporation Commission canceling the certificate of convenience and necessity issued to plaintiff to operate as a common carrier of passengers and express between Globe, Miami, and Globe, and Copper Hill serving Claypool, Midland City, and lower Miami, and issuing such a certificate to others to operate such service in the vicinity. From a decision upholding Corporation Commission's orders, the plaintiff appeals. On motion to strike the abstract of record and dismiss the appeal.
Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
Struckmeyer & Struckmeyer and Claude M. Spriggs, all of Phoenix, for appellant.
John L Sullivan, Atty. Gen. (Hill, Robert & Hill, and Darrell R Parker, all of Phoenix, of counsel), for appellees.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, upholding an order and ruling of the Corporation Commission of Arizona in the cancellation of the certificate of convenience and necessity issued the Consolidated Stage Company, and cancellation of the renewal of same, to operate as a common carrier for the transportation of passengers and express between Globe, Miami, and Globe and Copper Hill serving Claypool, Midland City and lower Miami. Also an appeal from the issuance to one B. Homer and S. B. Fitt to operate such service in the vicinity aforesaid.
There was filed in this court in this cause a motion to strike the abstract of record and dismiss the appeal. We consider the motion to dismiss the appeal vital, and, therefore, will give it our attention. The basis for the motion is that the judgment of the Superior Court affirming the orders of the Corporation Commission was dated July 10, 1945, and filed with the clerk of the Superior Court on July 16, 1945. Notice of appeal was filed with said court on July 6, 1945, ten days prior to the filing of judgment.
The chronological order of the record in this case pertaining to this subject down to the time of the filing of the judgment is as follows:
Sec. 21-1230, A.C.A.1939 on the subject of "Entry of judgment" reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Public Service Co. of N. M. v. Wolf
...(1925); Associates Discount Corp. v. DeVilliers, supra; Johnson v. Johnson, supra; Miller v. Doe, supra; Consolidated Stage Co. v. Corporation Comm'n., 66 Ariz. 75, 182 P.2d 937 (1947); In Re Lopus' Estate, 12 Cal.2d 651, 86 P.2d 818 (1939); Leach v. Manhart, 108 Colo. 71, 113 P.2d 1002 It ......
-
Arizona Corp. Com'n v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co.
...and under the provisions of Rule 58(a), Rules Civil Procedure, a formal written judgment was required. Consolidated Stage Co. v. Corporation Commission, 66 Ariz. 75, 182 P.2d 937. It is fundamental that appeal is a matter of statutory privilege rather than a right. No one has a natural righ......
-
Glenn v. Imperial Trust
...168 (1960). Whereas, the premature filing of a notice of appeal will not work to perfect an appeal, Consolidated Stage Co. v. Corporation Commission, 66 Ariz. 75, 182 P.2d 937 (1947), the question of whether the premature filing of a cost bond to perfect an appeal is one of first impression......
-
Seitz v. Superior Court of Maricopa County
...order had not yet been filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court, and the appeal therefor was premature. Consolidated Stage Co. v. Corporation Commission, 66 Ariz. 75, 182 P.2d 937. It is not necessary for us to determine whether the Superior Court had jurisdiction at the time of the Janua......