Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon
Decision Date | 01 March 1923 |
Docket Number | (No. 904.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Citation | 250 S.W. 447 |
Parties | CONSOLIDATED UNDERWRITERS v. SAXON et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Polk County; J. L. Manry, Judge.
Suit by the Consolidated Underwriters against Ada Saxon and others to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Judgment affirmed as modified.
C. A. Lord, of Beaumont, for appellant.
Feagin, German & Feagin and F. Campbell, all of Livingston, for appellees.
O'QUINN, J.
This suit was brought by appellant against appellees to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board allowing appellees compensation as claimed by them in the sum of $15 per week for 360 weeks, beginning April 4, 1921, on account of the death of W. L. Saxon, husband and father of appellees, who was an employé of the Saner-Ragley Lumber Company at the time of his death.
Appellees answered and filed cross-action against appellant, asserting their right to compensation, and alleging that the Saner-Ragley Lumber Company, a corporation operating a sawmill manufacturing lumber, was a subscriber within the terms of the Compensation Law, carrying a policy of insurance with appellant and that W. L. Saxon, deceased, was an employé of said Saner-Ragley Lumber Company, and that on April 4, 1921, while engaged in his work as foreman of the sawmill of said company, he was assaulted by Abe Johnson, another employé of said Saner-Ragley Lumber Company, and by said Johnson cut and stabbed, from the effects of which he died on April 8, 1921, and prayed for compensation in a lump sum.
Appellant pleaded general denial in answer to appellees' cross-action.
The case was tried before the court without a jury, and the award made by the Industrial Accident Board was set aside, and judgment rendered for appellees on their cross-action for the full amount of compensation claimed, covering 360 weeks at $15 per week, and decreed that the whole amount, $5,400, should be paid in a lump sum, without discount, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum on said sum from April 4, 1921, the date of the injury.
At the request of appellant, the court filed his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are:
Appellant's first two propositions challenge the court's findings of fact and conclusion of law that the deceased, W. L. Saxon, was killed in the course of his employment, and assert that the injuries of W. L. Saxon, causing his death, were not received in the course of his employment, within the terms of the Compensation Law, but that said injuries were the willful acts of a third person, intended to injure the said Saxon because of reasons personal to him.
This contention cannot be sustained. The undisputed facts show that R. M. Eagle was the general superintendent of the Saner-Ragley Lumber Company—general manager of the entire plant. Saxon was foreman at the sawmill, and as such had charge of all work pertaining to same. Johnson was the negro section foreman, employed in the railroad department of the company. At the time Saxon received his injuries the mill was shut down for repairs, and Saxon was engaged in having the repairs made. The repair work being done was on some brick furnaces in the boiler room, and being done under orders from the general superintendent, Eagle. Saxon asked Eagle for two shovels to be used in mixing mortar for said repair work, and Eagle had two shovels brought from the tool house of the section foreman. Eagle testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Marshall
...Association v. Behnken (Tex. Civ. App.) 226 S. W. 154; Id., 112 Tex. 103, 246 S. W. 72, 28 A. L. R. 1402; Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 447; Id. (Tex. Com. App.) 265 S. W. 143; Western Indemnity Co. v. Milam (Tex. Civ. App.) 230 S. W. From these decisions, th......
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Vogel
...v. Warner (Tex. Civ. App.) 234 S. W. 545; Georgia Casualty Co. v. Darnell (Tex. Civ. App.) 243 S. W. 579; Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 447; Millers' Indemnity v. Green (Tex. Civ. App.) 237 S. W. 979; Millers' Indemnity v. Huffaker (Tex. Civ. App.) 241 S. W. ......
-
Commercial Ins. Co. v. Austin
...In fact, there was no controverting testimony on that issue. The evidence supported the verdict of the jury. Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon, Tex.Civ. App., 250 S.W. 447; McClure v. Georgia Casualty Co., Tex.Com.App., 251 S.W. 800; Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Mills, Tex.Civ.App., 108 S......
-
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Beckworth
...Ass'n v. Behnken [112 Tex. 103, 246 S. W. 72, 28 A. L. R. 1402; Id. (Tex. Civ. App.) 226 S. W. 154], supra; Consolidated Underwriters v. Saxon [(Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 447; Id. (Tex. Com. App.) 265 S. W. 143], supra; Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 266 S. W. 574-578; Georgi......