Continental Cas. Co. v. Hall, s. A14-86-00873-C

Citation761 S.W.2d 54
Decision Date20 October 1988
Docket NumberNos. A14-86-00873-C,A14-86-00688-CV,s. A14-86-00873-C
Parties50 Ed. Law Rep. 906 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Appellant, v. G. Wayne HALL, Individually and as Next Friend of April Lynn Hall, Minor; Ronald Wyatt, Individually and as Next Friend of Nichole Wyatt, Minor; and Martin Urand, Appellees, and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Appellant, v. KATY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee. (14th Dist.)
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

Alice M. Giessel, Henry P. Giessel, Houston, Royal H. Brin, Jr., Dallas, Richard A. Simpson, Washington D.C., for appellant.

Jeffrey D. Horner, Larry Watts, Larry J. Doherty, W. Michael Leebron, II, George P. Hardy, III, Kelly Frels, Houston, Bob Roberts, Austin, for appellees.

Before J. CURTISS BROWN, C.J., and MURPHY and ROBERTSON, JJ.

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

This case arises from injuries sustained by children during a school sponsored tug-of-war, and appellant Continental Casualty Company's [hereinafter Continental] assertion that the Board of Education Liability [hereinafter BEL] policy it carried for the Katy Independent School District [hereinafter KISD] specifically excluded coverage for such injuries. We reverse the judgments of the trial court, and render judgment in favor of Continental.

In February of 1981, KISD students April Hall and Nichole Wyatt were participating in tug-of-war while at school. During the exercise, a knot tightened around the children's hands. Before the girls could extricate themselves, Hall had lost three fingers and Wyatt had had the skin and fingernails pulled from her fingers. In July of 1984, Hall and Wyatt filed suit in federal court against KISD, and ten employees, among whom was Martin Urand, the teacher supervising the tug-of-war. The federal action alleged the children had suffered damages as a result of the infringement of their constitutionally protected interests and rights to a safe educational environment, free from risk to their bodily integrity.

Following notice of the suit, Continental informed KISD that its BEL policy, provision IV(b)(3), specifically excluded coverage:

"(b) The Insurer shall not be liable to make any payment for loss in connection with any claim against the Assureds.

* * *

(3) for damages, direct or consequential, arising from bodily injury, sickness, or death of any person, or for damage to or destruction of any tangible property including loss or use thereof." [Emphasis added.]

Continental suggested KISD contact its general liability carrier. After a protracted exchange of letters with KISD, Continental itself contacted KISD's general liability carrier, Fidelity & Casualty. Fidelity answered the federal action, and filed a motion for summary judgment demonstrating that a single instance of negligence did not, as a matter of law, rise to the level of infringement of constitutional rights. Hall and Wyatt did not respond to the motion for summary judgment.

While the federal action was still pending, Hall and Wyatt filed suit in the district court of Fort Bend County against only Martin Urand. Urand shortly thereafter signed stipulations of liability. The trial court entered a consent judgment, awarding Hall and Wyatt $10.9 million damages; approved a covenant not to execute judgment in which Urand assigned all his rights against Continental to Hall and Wyatt; and issued a protective order sealing the file. Neither KISD, Fidelity & Casualty, the general liability carrier, nor Continental received notice of these state court proceedings.

After the consent judgment in the state court had become final, Hall and Wyatt agreed to dismissal of the federal court action--with prejudice as to some defendants, but without prejudice as to Urand and KISD. They then demanded payment from Continental on the consent judgment and, subsequently, filed the instant suit in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • University of Illinois v. Continental Cas. Co., 4-92-0121
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 3, 1992
    ...is excluded from coverage even though the child claimed a civil rights violation (Continental Casualty Co. v. Hall (Tex.Ct.App.1988), 761 S.W.2d 54, 56). Both cases, however, note that in determining the applicability of an exclusion, the [234 Ill.App.3d 361] courts must focus on the origin......
  • American Guarantee v. Shel-Ray Underwriters
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • March 5, 1993
    ...our review on the factual allegations in the complaint, not on the legal theories asserted. Continental Casualty Co. v. Hall, 761 S.W.2d 54, 56 (Tex.App.— Houston 14th Dist. 1988, writ denied), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 932, 110 S.Ct. 2174, 109 L.Ed.2d 503 (1990). Unless the petition alleges f......
  • Subsea 7 Port Isabel, LLC v. Port Isabel Logistical Offshore Terminal, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • December 19, 2019
    ...... other's detriment or to the misleading party's own benefit." Ulico Cas. Co. v. Allied Pilots Ass'n , 262 S.W.3d 773, 778 (Tex. 2008) (citing ......
  • Admiral Ins. Co. v. Gulshan Enters., Inc., Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-2837
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • November 15, 2017
    ...than on the legal theories advanced. See Willbros RPI, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co., 601 F.3d 306, 309 (5th Cir. 2010); Continental Cas. Co. v. Hall, 761 S.W.2d 54 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, cert denied Hall v. CNA Ins. Companies, 495 U.S. 932 (1990) (pointing out that when a stud......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT