Continental Casualty Co. v. Brawner
Decision Date | 11 May 1933 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 702. |
Citation | 148 So. 809,227 Ala. 98 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Parties | CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. v. BRAWNER. |
Rehearing Denied June 22, 1933.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County; E. S. Thigpen, Judge.
Action by the Continental Casualty Company against J. E. Brawner. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
E. O Baldwin, of Andalusia, for appellant.
A Whaley, of Andalusia, for appellee.
This is not a suit in equity to redeem from a mortgage sale, or that of a pledge; and the fact that a mortgagee purchased the property at a grossly inadequate price at his own foreclosure sale is held to be no defense at law. Dean v. Lyde, 223 Ala. 394, 136 So. 857; Coleman v. Solomon, 225 Ala. 407, 143 So. 576; Hicks v. Dowdy, 202 Ala. 535 81 So. 37; Barnett v. Dowdy, 207 Ala. 641, 93 So 638; Jones on Chattel Mortgages, § 808-a. The case of Suring State Bank v. Giese (Wis.) 246 N.W. 556, which was for the confirmation of a sale made pursuant to the court's order, wherein a court sitting in equity and so acting discussed the question of a fair value of the property purchased, was considered. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 483, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L.Ed. 931.
This suit was at law by a mortgagee against a mortgagor or his grantee assuming payment of the mortgage, and sought a deficiency judgment against such purchaser.
Prior to the purchase of the land and assumption of the mortgage by appellee, the same was owned by M. B. Hildreth, who, with his wife, executed the notes and mortgage of date of March 15, 1920, for $3,600, payable to the order of himself, on due date of February 1, 1930, and who indorsed the notes in blank and transferred the mortgage to Harry Lee Taft, as trustee.
Thereafter, on the 9th day of April, 1921, Hildreth and wife executed a warranty deed to appellee, J. E. Brawner, and Allen Crenshaw, embracing the lands so mortgaged; in that conveyance is the stipulation: "This conveyance is made with full warranty, but is subject to that certain mortgage to Harry Lee Taft, as Trustee, in the sum of $3600.00, which is assumed by the grantee herein, and which they agree to pay." (Italics supplied.) The evidence showed that this assumption and agreement to pay the mortgage was a part of the purchase price for the land or Hildreth's equity therein; that the interest notes and coupons from time to time were paid by appellee, with the exception of that for $216 payable on February 1, 1930. It is further shown that there was foreclosure of the mortgage under its power and after default; that the purchase of the lands was for $1,500 at foreclosure sale, leaving the balance of indebtedness of principal and interest; that the trust deed, principal, and interest notes had been duly transferred and assigned to appellant; that the balance due thereon when the suit was brought was $3,600 and interest from February 1, 1929. The court sustained objection to the answer to the interrogatory that appellant was the owner of the note and mortgage or trust deed of M. B. Hildreth, from June 6, 1923. Whereupon plaintiff offered, in evidence, the mortgage or trust deed, the principal note executed by Hildreth to the order of himself, the interest note or coupon for $216, each indorsed by Hildreth and wife, and the conveyance to Brawner and Crenshaw, and then undertook to introduce the transfer and assignment of that mortgage or deed by Pearsons and Taft, as trustees, to appellant, and to which objection by the defendant was sustained and exception was reserved.
Appellant then introduced in evidence the deposition of L. J. Cullen, together with all exhibits thereto; also the deposition of D. Hecox, together with exhibits thereto; and again offered in evidence the transfer by said trustees of said note indorsed in blank and the mortgage or trust deed to appellant; and again the court sustained appellee's objection thereto, and exception was duly reserved.
Appellant then sought to introduce in evidence the power of attorney by Taft, as trustee to E. O. Baldwin, authorizing the latter to conduct the foreclosure sale on account of "a breach of the covenants in said mortgage," under the powers contained in the mortgage, to act generally in connection therewith "to render good and valid such sale" as that trustee "might do if present" in person, ratifying and confirming all his acts and things which "said attorney may do pursuant to the power and authority hereby given." The court sustained objection, and there was due exception by the appellant. Appellant then offered in evidence the notice of said foreclosure sale, which was admitted to be correct, but to which objection was sustained and exception reserved. The foreclosure deed of date of February 17, 1931, was then offered, to which objection was sustained at plaintiff's instance, and exception reserved; also the telegram from E. O. Baldwin to appellant.
The bill of exceptions recites, as to this evidence by E. O. Baldwin, the rulings and action of the plaintiff appellant, as follows:
The rights of a mortgagee on default are well stated in the decisions (Harris v. Miller, 71 Ala. 26; Morris v. Fidelity Mortgage Bond Co., 187 Ala. 262, 65 So. 810; Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171), and of this right against...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howell v. Ward
... ... therefor. Faulkenberry, Ex'x, v. Ray (Ala.Sup.) ... 161 So. 486; Continental Casualty Co. v. Brawner, ... 227 Ala. 98, 148 So. 809; Hodge et al. v. Joy et ... al., 207 ... ...
-
First Nat. Bank v. Jaffe
... ... in strict conformity to its power. Continental Casualty ... Co. v. Brawner, 227 Ala. 98, 148 So. 809; Robertson ... v. Lytle, 236 Ala. 362, 182 ... ...
-
In re Morris
...sale yielded an amount in excess of the debt, the Hallmarks would have been entitled to such excess amount. Continental Casualty Co. v. Brawner, 227 Ala. 98, 148 So. 809 (1933); Hayes v. Woods, 72 Ala. 92 (1882). The result is unchanged by the fact that the purchaser was the mortgagee. See,......
-
Planters' Warehouse & Commission Co. v. Barnes
... ... 601, ... 148 So. 308; Hayes et al. v. Betts, 227 Ala. 630, ... 151 So. 692; Continental Casualty Co. v. Brawner, ... 227 Ala. 98, 148 So. 809; Maulitz v. Jones, 222 Ala ... 609, 133 ... ...