Continental Ins. Co. v. Canni

Decision Date19 April 1993
PartiesIn the Matter of CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. George R. CANNI, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Fisher & Seidner, P.C., Babylon (Barry Rosenfeld, of counsel), for appellant.

Alio & Ronan, Melville (Carol Simonetti, on the brief), for respondent.

Before MANGANO, P.J., and SULLIVAN, O'BRIEN, RITTER and PIZZUTO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 to stay arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, George R. Canni appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 15, 1991, which granted the application.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to obtain the insurer's consent prior to settling his claim against, and releasing from all liability, the motorist who allegedly caused his injuries, in contravention of the policy provisions governing underinsured motorist claims. Accordingly, the court properly granted the insurer's application for a permanent stay of arbitration of the insurer's denial of underinsured motorist benefits (see, Weinberg v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 379, 477 N.Y.S.2d 99, 465 N.E.2d 819; Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Scirica, 170 A.D.2d 448, 565 N.Y.S.2d 557; Matter of State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Donath, 164 A.D.2d 889, 559 N.Y.S.2d 567; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Parker, 160 A.D.2d 882, 554 N.Y.S.2d 315; State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Taglianetti, 122 A.D.2d 40, 504 N.Y.S.2d 476).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Travelers Indem. Co., Application of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 1993
    ...Mr. Levy's failure to obtain such consent constituted a breach of a condition of his policy (see, Continental Ins. Co. v. Canni, 192 A.D.2d 651, 596 N.Y.S.2d 471 (2d Dept.1993); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Taglianetti, 122 A.D.2d 40, 504 N.Y.S.2d 476 (2d Dept.1986)). Travelers is prej......
  • City Const. Development, Inc. v. Hartnett
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 19, 1993
  • State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Blanco
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 31, 1994
    ...benefits of the policy (see, Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. [Levy], 195 A.D.2d 35, 606 N.Y.S.2d 167; Matter of Continental Ins. Co. v. Canni, 192 A.D.2d 651, 596 N.Y.S.2d 471; State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Taglianetti, 122 A.D.2d 40, 504 N.Y.S.2d 476), unless the insured can demonstra......
  • State Farm Ins. Companies v. Bellomo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 27, 1995
    ...entered October 8, 1993, which granted the petition. ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Matter of Continental Ins. Co. v. Canni, 192 A.D.2d 651, 596 N.Y.S.2d 471; Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Scirica, 170 A.D.2d 448, 565 N.Y.S.2d 557; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT