Continental Ins. Co. v. Moseley, s. 13308
| Decision Date | 12 November 1982 |
| Docket Number | 13432,Nos. 13308,s. 13308 |
| Citation | 653 P.2d 158,98 Nev. 476 |
| Parties | CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sister Riccarda MOSELEY, Executrix of the Estate of Audrain Mavis-Marie Oliver, Respondent. The CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, Appellant, v. Jean Hooper STEVENS and Audrey Oliver, Respondents. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
In August of 1980, Audrain Mavis-Marie Oliver died testate, naming Sister Riccarda Moseley as executrix. Sister Riccarda Moseley, through her attorney, petitioned for probate of the will and for summary administration. On September 26, 1980, the district court entered an order admitting the will to probate, directing the issuance of letters testamentary and ordering summary administration.
On September 30, 1980, letters testamentary were issued and the notice to creditors was filed. The notice to creditors was published in the newspaper on October 4, 9 and 14, 1980, and the proof of publication was filed on October 20, 1980.
At the time of the decedent's death, there was a civil action pending against her which had been filed by appellant Continental. The action was filed against the decedent under the name of Audrey Oliver. Appellant received notice of Oliver's death on December 3, 1980, the last day for filing claims against her estate. However, appellant filed its claim (the subject of the civil proceeding) against Oliver's estate on December 5, 1980, two days after the time for filing claims had expired.
Subsequently, on December 9, 1980, appellant filed a motion in the civil proceeding seeking to substitute respondent Sister Riccarda Moseley for Audrey Oliver. The lower court denied appellant's motion on the ground that the motion was not timely filed. Appeal No. 13432 is from the denial of this motion.
On January 6, 1981, appellant Continental filed in the probate proceeding a motion to compel the executrix to publish notice to creditors. The district court entered its order denying Continental's motion to compel republication and declared appellant's claim forever barred. Appeal No. 13308 is from this order.
Appellant's primary contention is that the publication of notice to creditors is insufficient under constitutional standards of procedural due process. Thus, we are asked to reverse the lower court's decisions in both the civil and probate proceedings. For reasons hereinafter set forth, we reject appellant's contention, and affirm the decisions below.
In an estate proceeding, if the district court determines that the gross value of the estate does not exceed $60,000, the court may order summary administration of the estate. NRS 145.040. When summary administration is ordered, as in the present case, notice to creditors of the appointment of an executor or administrator must be published. NRS 145.050. In addition, NRS 145.060 requires creditors of the estate to file their claims "within 60 days after the first publication of the notice to creditors." NRS 145.060 further provides: "Any claim which is not filed within the 60 days, shall be barred forever." It was based upon this latter provision that the district courts denied appellant's motions.
Appellant concedes that the notice to creditors complied with the statutory requirements of NRS 145.050. Appellant also admits that it received notice of Oliver's death on December 3, 1981, which was the last day to file claims. It is nonetheless contended that mere compliance with the statutory notice provision does not satisfy the due process requirements of the constitution. We do not agree.
It is the policy of the law of Nevada with respect to summary administration of estates to provide an expeditious and comparatively unencumbered means of accomplishing estate administration. Such a policy is reasonable considering the size of estates within the purview of NRS ch. 145. It is therefore consistent with the policy of the law governing such estates that notices to creditors are somewhat circumscribed. If the cost of newspaper publication exceeds $25, the court is vested with power to authorize some other less costly means of providing notice. 1 In addition, the nonclaim period is reduced from 90 to 60 days from the date of first publication of notice and there is no "savings" provision which would exculpate creditors who proved lack of notice as provided by the statute. 2 We thus see a balancing of the interests of a decedent's heirs, devisees and legatees in the summary administration of their decedent's estates and the interests of creditors and claimants who seek access to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.
...Statutes, 33 Buffalo L.Rev. 389-415 [1984]. See also Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc., infra note 42 at 1356.In Continental Insurance Co. v. Moseley, 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158 [1982], vacated, 463 U.S. 1202, 103 S.Ct. 3530, 77 L.Ed.2d 1383 [1983], on remand, 683 P.2d 20 [Nev.1984], the Mennonit......
-
Palazzi v. Estate of Gardner
...in R.C. 2107.13 that the surviving spouse and resident heirs receive notice of the operative event.4 Continental Ins. Co. v. Moseley (1982), 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158.5 This concern is hardly inconsequential. See In re Estate of Pierce (1953), 245 Iowa 22, 28, 60 N.W.2d 894, 898.6 It must b......
-
Estate of Madden
...notice by publication to creditors violated procedural due process. The first time the case was heard, Continental Ins. Co. v. Moseley, 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158 (1982) (Moseley I ), the Nevada court ruled publication notice satisfied Mullane as notice by publication was reasonably and suff......
-
Estate of Pope, Matter of
...Ins. Co. v. Moseley, 463 U.S. 1202, 103 S.Ct. 3530, 77 L.Ed.2d 1383 [1983], vacated the Nevada Supreme Court's opinion (Moseley I, 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158 [1982] ), in which Mullane was held not to apply in favor of a known creditor. The Court remanded the case and directed the Nevada cou......
-
Published Notice Held Ineffective as to Known Creditors
...Footnotes: 1. 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1870, 56 U.S.L.W. 4303 (April 19, 1988). 2. 462 U.S. 791 (1983). 3. 339 U.S. 306 (1950). 4. 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158 (1982). 5. Continental Insurance Co. v. Moseley, 100 Nev. 337, 683 P.2d 20 (1984). 6. 733 P.2d 396 (Okla. 1986). 7. This article updates two pr......
-
Notice and Due Process in Probate Revisited
...Colorado Court of Appeals applied Mullane in Estate of Wimbush, 41 Colo.App. 289, 587, P.2d 796 (1978). 3. 445 P.2d 574 (Mont. 1968). 4. 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158 (1982). 5. 103 Sup.Ct. 2706, 77 L.Ed 180 (1983). This column is prepared by the Probate and Trust Law Section of the Colorado Ba......