Continental Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cochrane
Decision Date | 05 October 1931 |
Docket Number | 12513. |
Parties | CONTINENTAL MUT. INS. CO. v. COCHRANE, State Com'r of Insurance. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; Henry Bray Judge.
Action for a declaratory judgment by the Continental Mutual Insurance Company against Jackson Cochrane, as State Commissioner of Insurance. To review the judgment, plaintiff brings error.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
R. H Walker, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Robert E. Winbourn, Atty. Gen., and Fred A. Harrison, Asst. Atty Gen., for defendant in error.
The Continental Mutual Insurance Company, a mutual insurance corporation organized under the laws of Colorado, and authorized to transact business therein, sued Jackson Cochrane, as insurance commissioner of the state of Colorado, in the Denver district court seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment determining an alleged controversy between it and the defendant claimed to arise out of the opposing legal constructions of certain provisions of its charter membership policy, form No. 6.
These controverted provisions are alleged in the complaint as follows:
It is further alleged in the complaint that said policies, having been approved by the defendant, were sold by the plaintiff to numerous persons in the state of Colorado during the year 1928; that the amount of charter membership fees contracted to be paid by the purchasers of said policy during the year 1928 were $50,350; that of this amount $7,177.52 was paid by cash by such policyholders, and of said last named amount $4,796.77 was paid by plaintiff as commission to its agents, and that plaintiff received and holds in cash the balance of said cash payments amounting to $2,380.75. Plaintiff further received notes representing the unpaid portion of said charter membership fees.
These facts were incorporated in plaintiff's 1929 annual report filed. The complaint charges that said report shows plaintiff to have a surplus over and above all of its liabilities. It further avers that:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Quackenbush v. City of Cheyenne
... ... cases, all comparatively recent. Continental Mutual Ins ... Co. v. Cochrane, 89 Colo. 462, 4 P.2d 308; Adams v ... ...
-
City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.
...and seventh cases cited by respondent, we find nothing of any material assistance in the solution of our problem. In Continental Mutual Ins. Co. v. Cochrane, supra, the were the insurance company and the state insurance commissioner. The company sought a declaratory judgment construing its ......
-
Caroline St. Permanent Bldg. Ass'n No. I of Baltimore City v. Sohn, 45.
...A. 274; Wright v. McGee, 206 N. C. 52, 173 S.E. 31; Dobson v. Ocean Ace, etc., Corp, 124 Neb. 652, 247 N.W. 789; Continental Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cochrane, 89 Colo. 462, 4 P.2d 308. Another objection to the amended bill of complaint being held within the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act is that......
-
People ex rel. Inter-Church Temperance Movement of Colo. v. Baker
...upon this question, it would be improper for us to decide it in the absence of the necessary parties.' In Continental Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cochrane, 89 Colo. 462, 4 P.2d 308, 310, the court, after quoting that portion of the opinion in City and County of Denver v. Denver Land Co., supra,......
-
ARTICLE 51 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS
...of the necessary parties. City & County of Denver v. Denver Land Co., 85 Colo. 198, 274 P. 743 (1929); Cont'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cochrane, 89 Colo. 462, 4 P.2d 308 (1931). A declaratory judgment can only be taken to be a determination as to the rights of the parties before the court. Farmers ......
-
Rule 57 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS.
...the necessary parties. City & County of Denver v. Denver Land Co., 85 Colo. 198, 274 P. 743 (1929); Continental Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cochrane, 89 Colo. 462, 4 P.2d 308 (1931). No proceeding lies under our declaratory judgment act to obtain merely an advisory opinion. Farmers Elevator Co. v. Fir......
-
ARTICLE 51
...of the necessary parties. City & County of Denver v. Denver Land Co., 85 Colo. 198, 274 P. 743 (1929); Cont'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cochrane, 89 Colo. 462, 4 P.2d 308 (1931). A declaratory judgment can only be taken to be a determination as to the rights of the parties before the court. Farmers ......