Continental Trust Co. v. Cowart
Decision Date | 08 January 1915 |
Docket Number | (No. 6835.) |
Citation | 173 S.W. 588 |
Parties | CONTINENTAL TRUST CO. et al. v. COWART. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Angelina County; Lee D. Guinn, Judge.
Suit by S. J. Cowart, for himself and for the benefit of such stockholders as may join in the suit, against the Continental Trust Company and others. From a decree appointing a receiver of the corporation, defendants appeal. Reversed and rendered.
Monta J. Moore, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Jno. Lovejoy and Lane, Wolters & Storey, all of Houston, for appellants. Mantooth & Collins, of Lufkin, and Hamp P. Abney, of Sherman, for appellee.
This suit was brought by appellee, a minority stockholder in appellant corporation, for himself and for the benefit of such stockholders as might join in said suit, against the appellant Continental Trust Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Arizona, and having its office and place of business in the city of Houston, Harris county, Tex., and. Jonathan Lane, R. W. Thompson, J. H. Thompson, W. Strauss, J. F. Sadler, Jr., Jake Wolters, and N. R. Lynd, all of whom are alleged to be residents of Harris county, except the defendant Sadler, who is alleged to reside in Bexar county. The nature and purpose of the suit is thus stated in appellee's amended petition, upon which the hearing was had in the court below:
"This cause of action is brought against the Continental Trust Company, as a corporation, and against other defendants herein named individually and collectively, for the sum of $5,000 paid to the said defendants, officers, directors, and agents of said corporation, and for the cancellation of plaintiff's certain note for $5,000 due and payable to the American Surety & Casualty Company, and to cancel the mortgage lien on 1,600 acres of land, more or less, hereinafter more particularly described, which mortgage creates a cloud and incumbrance upon said survey of land, because of the fraudulent misrepresentations made by the officers, directors, and agents of said corporation, and for the appointment of a receiver, and, in the alternative, for the benefit of your said plaintiff in the cancellation of said $5,000 note, and lien and incumbrance upon said tract of land and for the use and benefit of the Continental Trust Company, and for such stockholders as may join herein."
The pleadings of plaintiff are voluminous and complex, and we shall only set out such of the allegations as are necessary to show the issues presented.
After alleging the organization of the appellant corporation on or about April 10, 1911, under the laws of the state of Arizona, with its home office in said state, and its Texas office and place of business at Houston, Harris county, and having as its officers, among others, the defendants before named, it is alleged:
That during the period of the promotion, organization, and chartering of appellant corporation the American Surety & Casualty Company was organized and chartered under the laws of this state with a capital stock of $200,000, and having the defendant Jonathan Lane as its president, and several of the other defendants herein, with a number of other named persons, as directors, "and that the law firm of Lane, Wolters & Storey were the legal advisers of said last-named corporation, and were stockholders, officers, and directors in said last-named corporation, and they together with the defendants Jonathan Lane, J. R. Thompson, W. R. Thompson, and J. F. Sadler, Jr., were general promoters and managers of said corporation in its promotion, organization, and chartering, and thereafter in the management of its moneys, funds, and credits, and are such officers, directors, and managers ever since and now; that the other officers named above so far as plaintiff is informed and believes, took no active part in the management of said corporation."
It is then alleged that during the year 1912 plaintiff was induced by an agent of said defendants to subscribe for 50 shares of stock in the American Surety & Casualty Company at a price of $200 per share, the face value of said shares being $100 each; that said agent represented to plaintiff that said shares were worth the sum of $200 each, and, relying upon said representations, plaintiff purchased same and paid to defendants the sum of $5,000, and executed his note for $5,000, payable to the American Surety & Casualty Company, and secured by said 50 shares of stock which were attached to said note as collateral, and also by a deed of trust upon a tract of 1,600 acres of land in Angelina county, said land being fully described in the petition.
The next allegation is, in substance:
That in March, 1913, the individual defendants before named "as stockholders, agents, officers, directors, and lawyers" in both the American Surety & Casualty Company and the appellant corporation "illegally and fraudulently entered into a combination, contract, and agreement to acquire from the stockholders of the American Surety & Casualty Company their stock in said company in exchange for stock in the appellant corporation, said exchange to be made upon a valuation of $160 for each $100 share of American Surety & Casualty Company stock, and $20 for each $10 share of the stock of appellant corporation; that, relying upon the representations of defendants and their agents that the stock in appellant corporation was of much greater value than stock in the American Surety & Casualty Company, plaintiff exchanged his 50 shares of stock in said last-named company for stock in appellant corporation upon the basis of value above stated."
The representations as to the value of the stock of the two corporations, and especially the representations as to the business of appellant corporation and the value of its assets, are alleged to have been false and fraudulent, and that plaintiff believing said representations to be true, made the exchange of stock as before stated, receiving in lieu of his 50 shares of stock in the American Surety & Casualty Company of the face value of $100 per share 400 shares of stock in appellant corporation of the face value of $10 per share. The said alleged false representations are charged to have been made in Angelina county by N. R. Lynd, acting for and on behalf of the other defendants, and to have been repeated and confirmed by the other defendants. The most material allegations as to the false representations of defendants are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morris v. Hanssen, 32208.
...114, 5 S.W. 611; Paxton v. Marshall, 18 Fed. 361; Pacific Juana Co. v. Anglor, 82 Ala. 492, 1 So. 852; Continental Trust Co. v. Cowart, 173 S.W. 588; Martin v. Thomas, 58 W. Va. 222, 49 S.E. 1118. (5) Endorsement and delivery of the notes to the bank as collateral security raised the presum......
-
Morris v. Hanssen
... ... 1088. (2) The relation of attorney and ... client between Yeoman and appellant was one of trust and ... confidence. Davis v. Kline, 96 Mo. 406; Eoff v ... Irvine, 108 Mo. 383; Guinan v ... Marshall, 18 F. 361; Pacific Juana Co ... v. Anglor, 82 Ala. 492, 1 So. 852; Continental Trust ... Co. v. Cowart, 173 S.W. 588; Martin v. Thomas, ... 58 W.Va. 222, 49 S.E. 1118. (5) ... ...
-
Hendricks v. Martin
...must restore, or in good faith proffer a restoration of, all the property which he acquired under the contract (Continental Trust Co. v. Cowart [Tex. Civ. App.] 173 S. W. 588), plaintiffs delivered — but to the court after the jury had been discharged — certain certificates of stock which t......
-
Forest Oil Co. v. Wilson
...matters of fact set forth to be true." In support of the sufficiency of this affidavit appellees cite us to the case of Continental Trust Co. v. Cowart, 173 S. W. 588, by the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, which was a suit by minority stockholders against the Continental Tru......