Cook v. State

Decision Date20 February 1979
Docket Number6 Div. 489
Citation369 So.2d 1260
PartiesRecardo COOK v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

BOWEN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of "robbery when the victim is intentionally killed" and sentenced to death. This Court affirmed his conviction on December 20, 1977.

The Alabama Supreme Court remanded this case to this Court with directions to order a rehearing in the circuit court. However further review convinces us that the case must be reversed and remanded under the principles recently asserted by the Alabama Supreme Court in Watters v. State, 369 So.2d 1272 (1979). The cause for the reversal of the appellant's conviction is identical to the cause of reversal in Watters.

An indictment charged that the appellant, Recardo Cook:

"feloniously took Three Thousand Dollars of the lawful currency of the United States of America, the personal property of Lewis Webb, from his person and against his will, by violence . . . and said defendant in the course of the aforesaid robbery, did intentially kill the said Lewis Webb by shooting him with a pistol." 1

However, from the entry of judgment on March 4, 1977, it clearly appears that the appellant was found guilty of an offense not charged in the indictment.

"(T)he defendant Recardo Cook, being in open Court and having been convicted by a jury of Murder in The First Degree and his punishment fixed by say (sic) jury at death, . . . . It is therefore considered by the Court and it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant Recardo Cook, is guilty of Murder in The First Degree in accordance with the verdict of the jury 2 in this cause, . . ."

We quote from Watters :

"Nowhere in the indictment is Murder charged against the defendant; nowhere in the judgment is petitioner pronounced guilty of attempted robbery in which the victim is intentionally killed. Therefore, there is a fatal variance between the indictment and the judgment, and the judgment cannot stand. Aiola v. State, 39 Ala.App. 215, 96 So.2d 816 (1957). Further, even if Murder were charged against the defendant such an offense is not one for which the death penalty can be imposed because it is not listed in our Death Penalty Act, § 13-11-2, Ala.Code of 1975.

"In § 15-17-1, Ala.Code of 1975 the legislature of this state provided for the jury's finding of guilt for a lesser offense than that charged in the indictment:

'When an indictment charges an offense of which there are different degrees, the jury may find the defendant not guilty of the degree charged and guilty of any degree inferior thereto or of an attempt to commit the offense charged; and the defendant may also be found guilty of any offense which is necessarily included in that with which he is charged, whether it be a felony or a misdemeanor.'

"However, it is clear from the terms of the Death Penalty Act that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Hodges v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 30, 2001
    ...was committed for pecuniary gain. Our Supreme Court in Cook v. State, 369 So.2d 1251, 1256 (Ala.1978), opinion on remand, 369 So.2d 1260 (Ala.Crim.App.1979), after remand, 384 So.2d 1158 (Ala.Crim. App.), cert. denied, 384 So.2d 1161 (Ala. 1980), "At Cook's sentencing hearing the trial judg......
  • Lane v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 8, 2013
    ...was committed for pecuniary gain. Our Supreme Court in Cook v. State, 369 So.2d 1251, 1256 (Ala.1978), opinion on remand, 369 So.2d 1260 (Ala.Crim.App.1979), after remand, 384 So.2d 1158 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 384 So.2d 1161 (Ala.1980), stated:“ ‘At Cook's sentencing hearing the tri......
  • Nelson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 26, 1980
    ...may not be added to or expanded. See Cook v. State, 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App.1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part, 369 So.2d 1251, 1257 (Ala.1978), on remand, 369 So.2d 1260 (Ala.Cr.App.1979). However, the fact that there is a significant history of prior criminal activity may be con......
  • Moss v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 14, 1988
    ...Watters v. State, 369 So.2d 1272,1273-74 (Ala.1979), overruled by Beck v. State, 396 So.2d 645 (Ala.1980) and Cook v. State, 369 So.2d 1260, 1261-62 (Ala.Cr.App.1979) with Jefferson v. State, 473 So.2d 1100, 1102-03 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), affirmed, Ex parte Jefferson, 473 So.2d 1110 (Ala.1985),......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT