Coppley v. Coppley

Decision Date07 May 1998
Docket NumberNo. 137P98.,137P98.
Citation348 N.C. 281,502 S.E.2d 846
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesLarry D. COPPLEY v. Mona Brock COPPLEY.

Max R. Rodden, Lexington, for Larry Coppley.

Edward P. Hausle, Greenville, Diane Q. Hamrick, High Point, for Mona Coppley.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of May 1998."

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • In re C-R.D.G.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 4, 2018
    ...to reconstruct the transcript (citing Coppley v. Coppley , 128 N.C. App. 658, 663, 496 S.E.2d 611, 616, disc. review denied , 348 N.C. 281, 502 S.E.2d 846 (1998) ) ). YFS’s exception at the hearing was insufficient to preserve its arguments for appeal.However, following entry of the trial c......
  • IN THE MATTER OF CR
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 21, 2004
    ...the failure of appellant to fulfill that responsibility. 128 N.C. App. 658, 663, 496 S.E.2d 611, 616, disc. review denied, 348 N.C. 281, 502 S.E.2d 846 (1998). However, in the case before us, respondents make no attempt whatsoever to reconstruct the Respondents have failed to indicate any s......
  • In re R.L.M.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 2013
    ...appellant to fulfill that responsibility.” Coppley v. Coppley, 128 N.C.App. 658, 663, 496 S.E.2d 611, 616,disc. review denied,348 N.C. 281, 502 S.E.2d 846 (1998). Even when appellate counsel does everything reasonably possible in an unsuccessful effort to reconstruct the testimony, “it is i......
  • Van Engen v. Que Scientific, Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 6, 2002
    ...only for an abuse of discretion." Coppley v. Coppley, 128 N.C.App. 658, 663, 496 S.E.2d 611, 616, disc. review denied, 348 N.C. 281, 502 S.E.2d 846 (1998). In its order setting aside the judgment against the Deans, the trial court concluded as a matter of law that the trial court did not ha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT