Cored Panels, Inc. v. Meinhard Commercial Corp.
| Decision Date | 09 October 1979 |
| Citation | Cored Panels, Inc. v. Meinhard Commercial Corp., 72 A.D.2d 544, 420 N.Y.S.2d 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979) |
| Parties | CORED PANELS, INC., Appellant, v. MEINHARD COMMERCIAL CORP., Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Gutman & Gutman, Mineola (Lawrence C. Gutman, Mineola, of counsel), for appellant.
Strassberg & Strassberg, New York City (Louis Strassberg, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before HOPKINS, J. P., and DAMIANI, O'CONNOR and RABIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 30, 1979, which denied the application.
Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and petitioner's application to stay arbitration is granted.
The subject arbitration clause drawn by respondent's assignor provided:
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.
...Regeant of Shelby v. Leumas Knitting Mills, 54 A.D.2d 667, 387 N.Y.S.2d 843, 844 (App.Div.1976); Cored Panels, Inc. v. Meinhard Commercial Corp., 72 A.D.2d 544, 420 N.Y.S.2d 731 (App.Div.1979). At least one New York decision has upheld the parties' right to refer some issues to arbitration ......
-
Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co., Inc.
...and its decisions have generally been approved and followed by the other departments (see, e.g., Cored Panels v. Meinhard Commercial Corp., 72 A.D.2d 544, 420 N.Y.S.2d 731 [2d Dept.]; Arcata Graphics Corp. v. Silin, 59 A.D.2d 1007, 399 N.Y.S.2d 738 [4th Dept.] The exceptions are to be found......
-
Silverman v. Carvel Corp.
...rule that arbitration agreements binding only one party are not valid. Id. at 659; see, e.g., Cored Panels, Inc. v. Meinhard Commercial Corp., 72 A.D.2d 544, 420 N.Y.S.2d 731 (2d Dep't 1979); Firedoor Corp. of Am., Inc. v. R.K. & A. Jones, Inc., 47 A.D.2d 878, 366 N.Y.S.2d 443 (1st Dep't Th......
-
Karl Koch Erecting Co., Inc. v. NY CONVENTION CTR. DEV.
...New York law that an arbitration provision affecting just one party is unenforceable. See, e.g., Cored Panels, Inc v. Meinhard Commercial Corp., 72 A.D.2d 544, 420 N.Y.S.2d 731 (2d Dep't 1979); Firedoor Corp. of America, Inc. v. R.K. & A. Jones, Inc., 47 A.D.2d 878, 366 N.Y.S.2d 443 (1st De......