Cormier v. Weiner
| Decision Date | 17 December 1931 |
| Citation | 277 Mass. 518,178 N.E. 723 |
| Parties | CORMIER v. WEINER. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Report from Appellate Division of Second District Court, Middlesex County; M. J. Connolly, Judge.
Action by Charles L. Cormier, p. p. a., against Nyman Weiner. On report, etc.
Order of Appellate Division in favor of defendant affirmed.
John C. Collins, of Waltham, for plaintiff.
J. A. Parrish and Emory C. Mower, both of Boston, for defendant.
The plaintiff at the time of the injury for which compensation is sought in this action was a young child, living with his parents in a tenement in the second floor of a house owned by the defendant. In the rear of the tenement was a wooden piazza. At the time the father of the plaintiff hired this tenement, the piazza and the stairway leading to the ground were unfinished in that there was no gate between the piazza and the top of the stairway and there were no picket uprights from the banister on the stairway to the various steps from the top down to a common landing. At that time the plaintiff's father brought this unfinished condition to the attention of the defendant on account of the age of the plaintiff. The defendant thereupon promised that he would install a gate and picket uprights so that the pizza ‘Would be all-right for child to out there,’ and because of that promise the plaintiff's father rented the tenement. The defendant did not install the gate and picket uprights, and by reason thereof the plaintiff fell and was injured. The trial judge found that the plaintiff's father rented the premises relying upon the defendant's promise to install the gate and pickets so as to make the piazza safe for the plaintiff; that this installation was a consideration in the renting and that the defendant retained such control of the piazza and stairway as would be necessary to enable him to make the installation. The piazza and stairway appear to have been part of the tenement and not common for the use of others.
[1] This case appeals strongly to the human sympathies of every person. It is plain, however, that on the established law of landlord and tenant the case presented on the findings is a simple breach of a contract obligation of the defendant to make the repair. A negligent omission in this particular is not ground for an action of tort by the plaintiff. The finding of control by the defendant was not justified as a mere inference from the contract to make the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bland v. City of St. Louis
...landlord. Lahtinen v. Continental Bldg. Co., 97 S.W.2d 102; Berkowitz v. Winston, 193 N.E. 343; Cullings v. Goetz, 176 N.E. 397; Corneir v. Werner, 178 N.E. 723; Kohnle v. Paxton, 268 Mo. 463; Davis v. Service Co., 131 S.W.2d 865. Occasional use of elevator by Northdurft, the harness maker,......
-
Chelefou v. Springfield Inst. for Sav.
...or changes. Bergeron v. Forest, 233 Mass. 392, 398, 124 N.E. 74;Fiorntino v. Mason, 233 Mass. 451, 453, 454, 124 N.E. 283;Cormier v. Weiner, 277 Mass. 518, 178 N.E. 723. The plaintiffs must recover, if at all, in accordance with this principle. The evidence warranted a finding that the land......
-
Sordillo v. Fradkin
...Mass. 169, 13 N. E. 465;Lane v. Raynes, 223 Mass. 514, 112 N. E. 152;Wierzbicki v. Thacher, 273 Mass. 346, 173 N. E. 512;Cormier v. Weiner, 277 Mass. 518, 178 N. E. 723. Those were cases, it is true, of promises to remedy defects in the tenement let, and not in parts of the premises remaini......
-
Soulia v. Noyes
...on the land in the right of the lessee." Cullings v. Goetz, 256 N.Y. 287, 176 N.E. 397. To the same effect are Cormier v. Weiner, 277 Mass. 518, 178 N.E. 723, 724; Chelefou v. Springfield Institution for Savings, 297 Mass. 236, 8 N.E.2d 769, 771; Hunkins v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., 86 N.H. 356, 1......