Corn v. City of Sapulpa
Decision Date | 04 February 1941 |
Docket Number | 29747. |
Citation | 110 P.2d 290,188 Okla. 418,1941 OK 44 |
Parties | CORN v. CITY OF SAPULPA et al. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. A petition when challenged by a general demurrer should be liberally construed in favor of the pleader.
2. A petition wherein it is alleged that an injury was sustained as a result of a tort committed by a servant while acting within the scope of his employment is not demurrable merely because of the further allegation that the instrumentality used in the commission of the tort was the property of the servant.
Appeal from District Court, Creek County; C. O. Beaver, Judge.
Action by Geraldine Corn against the City of Sapulpa and another for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. From an order sustaining separate demurrers of the named defendant to the amended petition of the plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
L. J Burt, of Sapulpa, for plaintiff in error.
T. L. Blakemore, of Sapulpa, for defendant in error.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, from an order which sustained the separate demurrer of the defendant in error, one of the defendants below, to the amended petition of said plaintiff in an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of the negligence of Isaac Bristow, the other defendant below, in the operation of an automobile owned by the latter defendant and used by him in the performance of his duties as an employee of the defendant in error.
The controversy here is over the effect which should be given to the following language used in the amended petition, to wit ...
To continue reading
Request your trial