Cornblith v. First Maintenance Supply Co.
| Decision Date | 26 December 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 32319,32319 |
| Citation | 74 Cal.Rptr. 216,268 Cal.App.2d 564 |
| Parties | Edward CORNBLITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FIRST MAINTENANCE SUPPLY CO., Inc., a corporation, and Arthur Fleischman, Defendants and Respondents. |
| Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Phill Silver, Hollywood, for plaintiff and appellant.
Persion & Margolis, and Gerald A. Margolis, Santa Monica, for defendants and respondents.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered upon the sustaining of defendants' demurrer to his complaint for damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend when plaintiff indicated to the court that he was unable to more strongly plead a cause of action.
In the complaint plaintiff alleged that he worked, under a written agreement of employment, as an outside commission salesman for defendant First Maintenance Supply Co.; defendant Fleischman was one of its officers. The complaint further alleges that defendant Fleischman, while in the course and scope of his employment and for the purpose of undermining plaintiff's morale and to cause him to terminate his employment, did the following acts: (1) He refused to permit a particular fellow employee to service plaintiff's accounts while plaintiff was recovering from injuries suffered in an automobile accident; (2) thereafter, when plaintiff had returned to part time work, he admonished another salesman not to give plaintiff any help; (3) subsequently, he informed other employees not to follow the customary procedure of taking phone orders from plaintiff, thereby requiring plaintiff to mail or personally bring in his orders; (4) and, finally, he failed to respond to plaintiff's written demand that his conduct and attitude (and that of the other employees of defendant) toward plaintiff be changed.
The complaint contains the additional general allegations that Fleischman's acts against plaintiff were inflicted with malice and with the intent to injure him mentally and emotionally; and that, as a consequence of defendant's acts, plaintiff 'suffered humiliation and severe emotional distress, all of which makes him nervous.'
The trial court correctly concluded that plaintiff's complaint fails to state a cause of action. 'Intentional infliction of emotional distress, without physical trauma, can be a ground of liability (State Rubbish, etc., Assn. v. Siliznoff, 38 Cal.2d 330, 240 P.2d 282,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crain v. Krehbiel
...State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n. v. Siliznoff, 38 Cal.2d 330, 336-339, 240 P.2d 282, 284-286 (1952); Cornblith v. First Maintenance Supply Co., 268 Cal.App.2d 564, 74 Cal.Rptr. 216 (1968); Leavy v. Cooney, 214 Cal.App.2d 496, 29 Cal.Rptr. 580 (1963); Perati v. Atkinson, 213 Cal.App.2d 472, 2......
-
Golden v. Dungan
...72--73. See also, Czap v. Credit Bureau of Santa Clara Valley, supra, 7 Cal.App.3d 1, 5, 86 Cal.Rptr. 417; Cornblith v. First Maintenance Supply Co. (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 564, 565, 74 Cla.Rptr. 216; Agostini v. Strycula (1965) 231 Cal.App.2d 804, 808--809, 42 Cal.Rptr. 314, and Perati v. At......
-
Fuentes v. Perez
...etc. Assn. v. Siliznoff (1952) 38 Cal.2d 330, 333--339, 240 P.2d 282, q.v. It was stated by Cornblith v. First Maintenance Supply Co. (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 564, 565, 74 Cal.Rptr. 216, 217 (quoting from State Rubbish etc. Assn. v. Siliznoff, supra), as follows: "Intentional infliction of emo......
-
Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.
...577 (1971), and Alcorn v. Anbro Eng'r Inc., 2 Cal.3d 493, 86 Cal.Rptr. 88, 468 P.2d 216 (1970), with Cornblith v. First Maintenance Supply Co., 268 Cal.App.2d 564, 74 Cal.Rptr. 216 (1968), Agostini v. Strycula, 231 Cal.App.2d 804, 42 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1965), and Perati v. Atkinson, 213 Cal.App......