Cornell v. State
| Decision Date | 29 March 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 54482,54482 |
| Citation | 389 N.E.2d 1064,46 N.Y.2d 1032,416 N.Y.S.2d 542 |
| Parties | , 389 N.E.2d 1064 David CORNELL, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. (Claim) |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. The dispositive question on this appeal is whether the State should be held vicariously liable for intentional torts committed by its employees outside the scope of their employment on the basis of a purported special protective duty owed the victim by the State. At the age of 14, while a patient in a State mental health facility, plaintiff was homosexually raped by a male attendant. He now seeks to recover damages from the State.
In the absence of any negligent behavior by an employer, liability for acts of an employee may generally be imposed upon the employer pursuant to the doctrine of Respondeat superior if the employee was acting within the scope of his employment (Sauter v. New York Tribune, 305 N.Y. 442, 113 N.E.2d 790). Although normally it is necessary that the act complained of actually be within the scope of employment, which was not the situation in this case, there are a few exceptions to this rule. One such exists if the employer "by contract or otherwise, has entered into some relation requiring him to be responsible for the protection of the plaintiff" (Prosser, Law of Torts (4th ed.), § 70, p. 465; accord 2 Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 26.9, p. 1391). In such instances, the employer may be held liable for entirely personal torts committed by its employees. Under common-law principles, this exception to the general rule has normally been applied for various policy reasons in cases involving common carriers (Stewart v. Brooklyn & Crosstown R. R. Co., 90 N.Y. 588) and innkeepers (De Wolf v. Ford, 193 N.Y. 397, 402, 86 N.E. 527, 529), as well as in a few other extremely unusual situations (e. g., Stone v. Eisen Co., 219 N.Y. 205, 114 N.E. 44).
Plaintiff now urges us to apply this exception so as to impose absolute liability upon the State for any injuries suffered by patients at State institutions at the hands of State employees, even if those employees are not acting in the scope of their employment and the State is free from any fault. This we refuse to do, and to the extent that this rationale may...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tomka v. Seiler Corp.
...in mall security office); Cornell v. State of New York, 60 A.D.2d 714, 401 N.Y.S.2d 107 (3d Dep't 1977), aff'd, 46 N.Y.2d 1032, 416 N.Y.S.2d 542, 389 N.E.2d 1064 (1979) (hospital not liable for sexual assault by hospital attendant on an infant under hospital's care). Thus, Tomka as a matter......
-
N. X. v. Cabrini Med. Ctr.
...A.D.2d 762; Nicolette T. v Hospital for Joint Diseases/Orthopaedic Inst., 198 A.D.2d 54; Cornell v State of New York, 60 A.D.2d 714, affd 46 N.Y.2d 1032) Here, of course, there is no question but that Dr. Favara committed a sexual assault, not an examination, and no one, including plaintiff......
-
Kenneth R. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
...the appellant is not vicariously liable for his conduct under the theory of respondeat superior (see, Cornell v. State of New York, 46 N.Y.2d 1032, 416 N.Y.S.2d 542, 389 N.E.2d 1064; Mercer v. State of New York, 125 A.D.2d 376, 509 N.Y.S.2d 103). Consequently, the Supreme Court granted thos......
-
Wait v. Beck's North America, Inc.
...the scope of the employee's employment. See Girden v. Sandals Int'l, 262 F.3d 195, 205 (2d Cir.2001); Cornell v. State of New York, 46 N.Y.2d 1032, 1033, 416 N.Y.S.2d 542, 389 N.E.2d 1064, reargument denied, 47 N.Y.2d 951, 419 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 393 N.E.2d 1051 (1979); Riviello v. Waldron, 47 N......
-
RETRIBUTION AGAINST CATHOLIC DIOCESES BY REVIVAL: THE EVOLUTION AND LEGACY OF THE NEW YORK CHILD VICTIMS ACT.
...therefore the appellant is not vicariously liable for his conduct under the theory of respondeat superior") (citing Cornell v. State, 389 N.E.2d 1064 (N.Y. 1979)); Doe v. Rohan, 793 N.Y.S.2d 170, 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005) ("[s]ince the bus driver's acts of sexual abuse and molestation were ......