Corpus Christi Gas Co. v. City of Corpus Christi
Decision Date | 17 March 1926 |
Docket Number | (No. 7519.) |
Citation | 283 S.W. 281 |
Parties | CORPUS CHRISTI GAS CO. v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Nueces County; W. B. Hopkins, Judge.
Suit by the City of Corpus Christi against the Corpus Christi Gas Company and others. Decree for plaintiff, and named defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
Templeton, Brooks, Napier & Brown, of San Antonio, for appellant.
James M. Taylor and Boone & Savage, all of Corpus Christi, for appellees.
The city of Corpus Christi brought this suit against the appellant Corpus Christi Gas Company, White Point Production Company, and H. S. Bettes and L. T. Prewitt, to restrain them from digging trenches along and across certain streets of the city of Corpus Christi and from laying pipes therein for the purpose of bringing in and transporting natural gas. A temporary restraining order was granted by the district judge and thereafter made permanent.
Appellant answered fully, and by way of cross-action set up its franchise rights granted to it by appellee city, under which the right was given to distribute natural gas in said city and to dig trenches and lay pipes in the streets for that purpose. On the hearing thereof the court entered its decree denying any relief to appellant and perpetuating the injunction. The judgment, in part, is as follows:
The court conceived the erroneous idea that appellant had no right under its charter to distribute natural gas. The rights of appellant if any, grow out of its charter right contained in Section 7 of the franchise, to-wit:
"If natural gas...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Texas Power & Light Co. v. City of Garland
...paving that part of its streets between and along the rails of a company which held a franchise. Corpus Christi Gas Co. v. City of Corpus Christi, 283 S.W. 281 (Tex.Civ.App.1926, writ ref.) was an action to restrain a gas company from digging trenches along city streets. Southwestern Telegr......
-
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Fleming
...58 Tex.Civ.App. 109, 123 S.W. 213; City of Vernon v. Montgomery, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W. 188, writ refused; Corpus Christi Gas Co. v. Corpus Christi, Tex.Civ.App., 283 S.W. 281, writ refused; Northern Texas Utilities Co. v. Community Natural Gas Co., Tex.Civ.App., 297 S.W. 904, writ refused;......
-
Community Natural Gas Co. v. Northern Texas U. Co.
...suit. While under the general rule a municipality may be estopped by acts and conduct within its powers (Corpus Christi Gas Co. v. Corpus Christi [Tex. Civ. App.] 283 S. W. 281), it is settled law that it cannot be estopped by ultra vires acts or unauthorized or illegal conduct or by statem......
-
State v. City of Dallas, s. 10656 and 10657
...devoted to public use which are protected by constitutional guarantees are valuable property rights. Corpus Christi Gas Co. v. City of Corpus Christi, Tex.Civ.App., 283 S.W. 281, er Article 1416 grants authority to Telephone and Telegraph Companies to place their untility facilities in stre......