Corson v. Waller

Decision Date01 February 1904
Citation78 S.W. 656,104 Mo. App. 621
PartiesCORSON v. WALLER.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cooper County; James E. Hazell, Judge.

Proceeding by James M. Corson against John A. Waller, administrator of the estate of William H. Glasgow, deceased. From a judgment dismissing the cause, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

C. C. D. Carlos and Jno. Cosgrove, for appellant. W. M. Williams and C. D. Corum, for respondent.

SMITH, P. J.

The plaintiff delivered to the defendant administrator the following notice:

"To John A. Waller, administrator of the estate of Wm. H. Glasgow, deceased: Take notice that at the next term of the probate court of Cooper county, Mo., to be held at the court house in the city of Boonville, in said county, on the second Monday of August, 1902, on the first day of said term, or as soon thereafter as I can be heard, I shall present to said court for allowance against said estate a demand founded upon the following, to wit:

                                   "`October 15, 1900
                  "`Received of J. M. Corson the sum of
                $58.50, on the H. M. Keevil note
                                    "`W. H. Glasgow.'
                                  "`December 13, 1900
                  "`Received of J. M. Corson the sum of
                $67.85 in full payment of the H. M. Keevil
                note.                    W. H. Glasgow
                  "`June 25, 1902. J. M. Corson
                  "`State of Missouri, County of Cooper, ss.
                J. M. Corson, the above named claimant,
                makes oath and says, that to the best of his
                knowledge and belief he has given credit to
                the estate of William H. Glasgow, deceased,
                for all payments and offsets to which it is
                entitled and that the balance claimed is justly
                due.                         J. M. Corson.
                  "`Subscribed and sworn to this 30th day
                of June, 1902.
                         "`C. C. D. Carlos, Notary Public.'"
                

On which notice there was indorsed in writing by the administrator the waiver "of service of any notice on me of the presentation of the above demand to the probate court," etc. On August 11, 1902, the parties appeared before the probate court, when and where there was a trial on the merits, resulting in judgment for defendant. An appeal was taken by plaintiff to the circuit court, where plaintiff, by leave of court, filed an amended statement, which was as follows:

"Plaintiff, by leave of court first had and obtained, for his amended statement herein states that he and Wm. H. Glasgow, deceased, on the ____ day of ____, 1898, executed and delivered their joint note to H. M. Keevil for the sum of $117; that, in order to settle and pay off said note, he paid to Wm. H. Glasgow, deceased, on the 15th of October, 1900, the sum of $58.50, and on the 13th of December, 1900, * * * the further sum of $67.85, both of which sums so paid by plaintiff to said Wm. H. Glasgow, said Glasgow promised and agreed to pay and cause to be credited on the note to the said H. M. Keevil, which payments will appear by receipts dated on the dates above given, and herewith filed, and marked Exhibits A and B; that said Glasgow failed and neglected to pay said sums to said H. M. Keevil, and failed to have said sums or either of them credited on said note so held by said Keevil; that since the death of said Glasgow the said Keevil instituted a suit against John A. Waller, as administrator of the estate of said Wm. H. Glasgow, and plaintiff on said note, before J. L. Stephens, Esquire, a justice of the peace of Kelly township, Cooper county, Mo., and recovered judgment for the amount due on said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • In re Thomasson's Estate
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1946
    ... ... in the circuit court upon claimant's appeal ... Claimant's contention is disallowed. Consult also ... Watkins v. Donnelly, 88 Mo. 322; Corson v ... Waller, 104 Mo.App. 621, 78 S.W. 656; Simon v ... Ryan, 101 Mo.App. 16, 73 S.W. 353 ...          Claimant ... alleged that ... ...
  • Bennett v. Boatmen's Natl. Bank, 39722.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1946
    ...circuit court upon claimant's appeal. Claimant's contention is disallowed. Consult also Watkins v. Donnelly, 88 Mo. 322; Corson v. Waller, 104 Mo. App. 621, 78 S.W. 656; Simon v. Ryan, 101 Mo. App. 16, 73 S.W. [2] Claimant alleged that on or about March 15, 1932, separate informations were ......
  • Minor v. Lillard
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1957
    ...amendments have been allowed when the effect is to make the same demand more specific (Watkins v. Donnelly, 88 Mo. 322; Corson v. Waller, 104 Mo.App. 621, 78 S.W. 656), to correct the affidavit (Dawson v. Wombles, 104 Mo.App. 272, 78 S.W. 823), to show the real consideration for the alleged......
  • Jensen v. McCall's Estate
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1968
    ...the nature of the claim is not changed and its amount is not increased. Siegel v. Ellis, Mo., 288 S.W.2d 932, 938(5); Corson v. Waller, 104 Mo.App. 621, 78 S.W. 656, 658(2); Minor v. Lillard, Mo., 306 S.W.2d 541, 543. See also S.Ct. Rules 55.53 and On the basis of its alternate motion, the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT