Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. Hellas Telecomms.
Decision Date | 15 September 2016 |
Parties | CORTLANDT STREET RECOVERY CORP., et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, S.À.R.L., et al., Defendants–Respondents, Hellas Telecommunications Finances, etc., et al., Defendants. Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp., et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. David Bonderman, et al., Defendants–Respondents, Hellas Telecommunications, II etc., et al., Defendants. [And Another Action]. Cortlandt Street Recovery Corp., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Hellas Telecommunications, II etc., et al., Defendants, Hellas Telecommunications, S.à.r.l., et al., Defendants–Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP, New York (Mark C. Zauderer of counsel), for appellants.
Jared B. Stamell, Andrew R. Goldenberg, Stamell & Schager, LLP, New York, for appellants.
White & Case LLP, New York (Paul B. Carberry of counsel), for Hellas Telecommunications, S.à.r.l., respondent.
Ropes & Gray LLP, New York (Robert S. Fischler of counsel), for Apax respondents.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, New York (Paul M. O'Connor III of counsel), for TPG respondents.
TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, FRIEDMAN, RICHTER, KAHN, JJ.
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered on or about September 22, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint in each of three separate actions, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint in the action bearing Index No. 653357/11 insofar as asserted by plaintiff Wilmington Trust Company, as indenture trustee, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about February 6, 2015, which, upon renewal, adhered to the prior determination granting defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint in Index No. 653357/11, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.
Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint in the action bearing Index No. 653357/11 to the extent that the complaint in that action has been filed by plaintiff Wilmington Trust Company, as indenture trustee (the Trustee). In its complaint, the Trustee asserts, in addition to breach of contract claims, causes of action for fraudulent conveyance, for unlawful corporate distribution, for unjust enrichment, and based on an alter ego theory. Section 6.03 of the indenture governing the notes provides, in pertinent part: “If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee may pursue any available remedy to collect the payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes.” This provision confers standing on the Trustee to pursue, not only the breach of contract claims, but also the fraudulent conveyance and other aforementioned claims, which seek recovery solely of the amounts due under the notes, for the benefit of all noteholders on a pro rata basis, as a remedy for an alleged injury suffered ratably by all noteholders by reason of their status as noteholders (see Feldbaum v. McCrory Corp., 1992 WL 119095, *8, 1992 Del.Ch. LEXIS 113, *27–28 [Del.Ch. June 1, 1992] []; see also Lange v. Citibank, N.A., 2002 WL 2005728, *7, 2002 Del.Ch. LEXIS 101, *20 [Del.Ch. Aug 13, 2002] [same] ). Significantly, the Trustee does not assert causes of action for fraudulent misrepresentation or other claims seeking recovery for particular injuries unique to individual noteholders, nor does the Trustee seek a measure of damages other than the amounts due under the notes (cf. Regions Bank v. Blount Parrish & Co., 2001 WL 726989, *1, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8814, *1 [ND.Ill. June 27, 2001] [...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. Bonderman
...to dismiss the complaint (Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v Hellas Telecom., S.à.r.l., 47 Misc.3d 544 [Sup Ct, NY County 2014], affd as mod 142 A.D.3d 833 [1st Dept 2016], affd 31 N.Y.3d 30 [2018]). The court held that the indenture failed to authorize the trustee to prosecute the causes of ac......
-
Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. Bonderman
...to dismiss the complaint (Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v Hellas Telecom., S.à.r.l., 47 Misc.3d 544 [Sup Ct, NY County 2014], affd as mod 142 A.D.3d 833 [1st Dept 2016], affd 31 N.Y.3d 30 [2018]). The court held that the indenture failed to authorize the trustee to prosecute the causes of ac......
-
Torin Assocs., Inc. v. Perez
...and where 'outside proof is needed, other than simple proof of nonpayment' to calculate the amount due."), aff'd as modified, 142 A.D.3d 833 (1st Dep't 2016). Cases where the expedited procedure was found to be inappropriate involved unascertainable conditions or methodologies for determini......
-
Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. Bonderman, 14
...by WTC as indenture trustee, and otherwise affirmed the orders ( Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. Hellas Telecommunications, S.à.r.l., 142 A.D.3d 833, 37 N.Y.S.3d 505 [1st Dept. 2016] ). The Court concluded that the relevant language of the indenture "confers standing on the trustee to pursu......
-
E. Summons and Motion For Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint
...Corp. v. Bonderman (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co. 2015), aff'd as mod. sub nom. Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. Hellas Telecomms., S.A.R.L., 142 A.D.3d 833, 37 N.Y.S.3d 505 (1st Dep't...