Cotton v. State

• Decision Date: 25 June 2001
• Docket Number: No. S01A0886.,S01A0886.
• Citation: 549 S.E.2d 71,274 Ga. 26
• Parties: COTTON v. The STATE.
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court

549 S.E.2d 71

274 Ga. 26

COTTON v. The STATE.

No. S01A0886.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

June 25, 2001.

William D. Phillips, Macon, for appellant. Howard Z. Simms, Dist. Atty., Sandra G. Matson, Myra Y. Hutchinson, Asst. Dist. Attys., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Adam M. Hames, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

CARLEY, Justice.

A jury found Willie James Cotton guilty of felony murder of Anthony Fletcher while in the commission of an aggravated assault. The trial court entered a judgment of conviction and sentenced Cotton to life imprisonment. A timely filed motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.¹

1. Construed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that the victim stopped his car to purchase drugs from Gerald Brown. Cotton approached the vehicle on the passenger side, showed the victim some drugs, demanded money, and began struggling with him. As the victim began to drive away, a single shot was fired through his right arm and into the right side of his chest. Cotton immediately fell to the ground with a pistol by his side and he was subsequently seen in possession of the gun. A rational trier of fact could have found Cotton guilty of felony murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Taylor v. State, 272 Ga. 559, 560(1), 532 S.E.2d 395 (2000); Dunn v. State, 263 Ga. 343(1), 434 S.E.2d 60 (1993); Smith v. State, 260 Ga. 746, 748(2), 399 S.E.2d 66 (1991).

2. Cotton contends that, because the State failed to prove the essential elements of the underlying felony of aggravated assault, the trial court erred in refusing to give a charge on involuntary manslaughter as a lesser-included offense. We have already determined that the proof of felony murder while in the commission of aggravated assault was sufficient. A requested charge on a lesser included offense must be given only if the evidence "actually warrant[s] the requested charge. [Cits.]" Moses v. State, 264 Ga. 313, 315(2), 444 S.E.2d 767 (1994).

Cotton relies only on evidence that he apparently did not expect the vehicle's sudden movement and that no witness actually saw him threaten the victim with a gun. However, this evidence does not give rise to an inference which supports Cotton's hypothetical that the shooting was unintentional. See Dickey v. State, 240 Ga. 634, 642(6), 242 S.E.2d 55 (1978). There is no evidence that Cotton merely pointed a weapon at the victim or was otherwise committing either a misdemeanor or a lawful act in an unlawful manner. Indeed, the undisputed evidence shows that, during an unprovoked attack by Cotton, who reached in through the passenger window, the gun was fired from inside the car on the passenger side at close range. See Dickey v. State, supra at 642(6), 242 S.E.2d 55. The only evidence that Cotton did not commit aggravated assault was his pre-trial statement, in which he admitted his presence on the passenger side of the car, but denied that he shot the victim or that he even had a gun. This statement did not show that Cotton committed any crime at all with regard to the discharge of the gun. See Bellamy v. State, 272 Ga. 157, 159(2), 527 S.E.2d 867 (2000). Thus, the State's evidence supported a finding that Cotton was guilty of felony murder, whereas his denial would...