Coughlin v. Gray

Decision Date09 April 1881
Citation131 Mass. 56
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesAnn Coughlin v. Benjamin A. Gray & another. Jeremiah Coughlin v. Dennis Mahoney & another. Same v. Same & others

Argued November 3, 1880

Essex. Three actions of tort. The declaration in each case contained a count for assault and battery, a count for trespass and a count for trover. The cases were tried together in the Superior Court, before Allen, J., who, after a verdict for the defendants, allowed a bill of exceptions, the substance of which appears in the opinion.

Exceptions sustained.

C Sewall, for the plaintiffs.

J. A Gillis, for the defendants.

Morton J. Endicott & Field, JJ., absent.

OPINION

Morton, J.

As a justification of their forcible entry into the premises occupied by the plaintiffs, the defendants relied upon a mortgage deed from Jeremiah Coughlin, one of the plaintiffs, to Harriet Stearns, a sale under the power contained in said mortgage, and a deed, dated May 13, 1878, from the mortgagee to Perkins, one of the defendants, under whose directions the other defendants acted. As against the mortgagor, if his rights only were concerned, and he were occupying the premises as his own, Perkins had the superior right of possession, and in such case the plaintiffs could not maintain either of these actions. Low v. Elwell, 121 Mass. 309.

But, in reply to the defendants' case, the plaintiffs offered in evidence a deed of the premises from the tax collector of the city of Salem to the city, dated July 20, 1877, a sale of the premises having been made for taxes duly assessed upon them; and also offered evidence tending to show that, at the time of the alleged trespass, they were occupying the premises as the tenants of the city of Salem. The court rejected this evidence.

A tax sale and deed under it, if duly made, convey to the purchaser a title paramount to that of a prior mortgagee. Parker v. Baxter, 2 Gray 185. The purchaser takes an estate defeasible by the payment by the mortgagor or mortgagee of the amount of the taxes, intervening charges and interest, but, until the redemption, he has the right of possession, and the prior mortgagee has no right of possession as against him. If the sale for taxes had been made under the Gen. Sts. c. 12, to a third party as purchaser, who had taken possession, it is clear that the mortgagee could not enter and expel him, because the purchaser has a right of possession which is superior to his.

In this case, the deed to the city of Salem was made under the St. of 1862, c. 183. This statute authorizes the collector in certain contingencies, to purchase an estate offered for sale for nonpayment of a tax, on behalf of the town or city by which the tax is assessed. The second section provides that the deed of the collector in such case "shall confer upon such town or city the same rights as belong to an individual to whom such a deed may be given. And the several towns and cities of this Commonwealth, in their corporate capacity, are hereby authorized, as holders of said deeds, to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Hopkins v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • August 29, 1950
    ...two years after the date of the tax sale. Mass. Anno. Laws, supra, ch. 60, Sec. 45. A town may purchase the property for taxes, Coughlin v. Gray, 131 Mass. 56, but it may not foreclose the owner's right of redemption until after the expiration of the statutory two-year period, City of Bosto......
  • Lash v. Ames
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 24, 1898
    ... ... landlord, need not be determined. See Low v. Elwell, ... 121 Mass. 309, and cases cited; Coughlin v. Gray, ... 131 Mass. 56; Stone v. Lahey, 133 Mass. 426; ... Twombly v. Monroe, 136 Mass. 464. We are of opinion ... that, whether or not the ... ...
  • Gaunt v. Arzoomanian
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 25, 1943
    ... ... of the mortgagees and to that of the original owner of the ... equity in the land. Parker v. Baxter, 2 Gray, 185, 189 ... Hunt v. Boston, 183 Mass. 303 , 306. Abbott v ... Frost, 185 Mass. 398 ... Chadwick v. Cambridge, ... 230 Mass. 580 ... Donovan v ... continued until foreclosed through petition in the Land Court ... as provided in Sections 64-75. Coughlin v. Gray, 131 ... Mass. 56, 57. Jenney v. Tilden, 270 Mass. 92 , 95 ... The mortgagees' right to redeem from the tax title was ... foreclosed by ... ...
  • Ferrigno v. O'Connell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • February 28, 1944
    .... Howard v. Merriam, 5 Cush. 563. Cooper v. Adams, 6 Cush. 87. King v. Lawson, 98 Mass. 309 . Holbrook v. Young, 108 Mass. 83 . Coughlin v. Gray, 131 Mass. 56 . Hart Bouton, 152 Mass. 440. O'Reilly v. Frye, 263 Mass. 318 . Foley v. Gamester, 271 Mass. 55. Berman v. Shaheen, 273 Mass. 343 . ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT