Council About Parochiaid v. Secretary of State, 1

Decision Date28 September 1978
Docket NumberNo. 1,1
Citation403 Mich. 396,270 N.W.2d 1
PartiesCOUNCIL ABOUT PAROCHIAID, Loretta J. Manwaring, Henry Linne, William Mays, Jr., and Keith Geiger, Plaintiffs, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Director of Elections, and Members of the Board of State Canvassers, Defendants. 403 Mich. 396, 270 N.W.2d 1
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Before KAVANAGH, C. J., and WILLIAMS, LEVIN, COLEMAN, FITZGERALD, RYAN and MOODY, JJ.

ORDER

Plaintiffs have filed a complaint for mandamus in which they have asked the Court to direct the defendant State Board of Canvassers to invalidate the initiative petitions to amend the Constitution filed by the Citizens for More Sensible Financing of Education and to prohibit the defendant Secretary of State from certifying the proposition for the general election ballot. The Board thereafter on September 8, 1978, declared the sufficiency of the petitions.

On September 12, 1978, the Court ordered the defendants to show cause why the relief sought in the plaintiffs' complaint should not be granted and limited consideration to three questions: (1) whether the content of descriptive material that was attached to the petitions at the time of circulation and removed prior to filing was deceptive; (2) whether the heading "Initiative Petition, Amendment to the Constitution" was set forth on the side rather than the top of each petition sheet in violation of M.C.L. § 168.482; M.S.A. § 6.1482; and (3) whether the petitions should be invalidated, pursuant to M.C.L. § 168.482; M.S.A. § 6.1482 due to the inaccuracy of the second sentence of art. 9, § 6 of the Constitution of 1963 as set forth on the petitions.

Oral arguments were presented September 27, 1978. With the imminence of the election, an immediate determination is hereby rendered.

We conclude that the descriptive material attached to the petition at the time of circulation is not a part of the petition and, when considered with the summary paraphrase of the proposed amendment and the body of the petition, is not deceptive. Having reviewed the initiative petition against the allegation that the heading was placed contrary to M.C.L. § 168.482; M.S.A. § 6.1482, we hold the determination by the State Board of Canvassers, that the form of the petition complied with the statute, was not erroneous. Regarding the third question, considering the nature of the omission and the full text of the petition, we conclude this petition was sufficiently accurate to comply with statutory requirements. The complaint...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Reproductive Freedom for All v. Bd. of State Canvassers
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • September 8, 2022
    ...accurate to comply with" MCL 168.482(3) ’s requirement that the full text be provided. Council About Parochiaid v Secretary of State , 403 Mich. 396, 397, 270 N.W.2d 1 (1978). Our order is too cursory to make sense of for purposes of the present case. We did not adequately describe the fact......
  • Citizens for Protection of Marriage v. BD. OF CANVASSERS
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • October 28, 2004
    ...of the proposal. MCL 168.476; Ferency v. Secretary of State, 409 Mich. 569, 297 N.W.2d 544 (1980); Council About Parochiaid v. Secretary of State, 403 Mich. 396, 270 N.W.2d 1 (1978); Leininger v. Secretary of State, 316 Mich. 644, 26 N.W.2d 348 (1947). Here, the Board approved the form of t......
  • Gracey v. Grosse Pointe Farms Clerk
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 7, 1990
    ...November election, it is traditional in these election cases for the courts to rule peremptorily, Council About Parochiaid v. Secretary of State, 403 Mich. 396, 397, 270 N.W.2d 1 (1978), in [182 MICHAPP 198] some cases rendering a decision by order, with an opinion containing the court's ra......
  • Automobile Club of Michigan Committee for Lower Rates Now v. Secretary of State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • August 27, 1992
    ...render the petitions invalid as somehow being not in the "form prescribed by the Secretary of State." Council About Parochiaid v. Secretary of State, 403 Mich. 396, 270 N.W.2d 1 (1978). The identification of the proponents of initiative legislation is not specifically prohibited by Secs. 48......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT