Countryside Christian Center, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 88-02368

Citation542 So.2d 1037,14 Fla. L. Weekly 949
Decision Date14 April 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-02368,88-02368
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 949 COUNTRYSIDE CHRISTIAN CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, a municipal corporation in the State of Florida, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Patrick T. Maguire, Clearwater, for appellant.

M.A. Galbraith, Jr., City Atty., Clearwater, for appellee.

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant/plaintiff Countryside Christian Center, Inc. challenges an order in which the trial court denied its motion for preliminary injunction and dismissed with prejudice its complaint against appellee/defendant City of Clearwater. The complaint sought a declaratory judgment as to whether the City's policy of requiring annexation before it will provide sanitary sewer service to appellant is unlawful, and requested preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to prevent the City from enforcing its policy against appellant. Appellant admits that the complaint was deficient, but argues that it should have been granted leave to amend. We agree. It is error for a trial court to dismiss a complaint with prejudice where the complaint is not clear that the complaint cannot be amended. Crews v. Ellis, 531 So.2d 1372, 1375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Thus, although the trial court was correct in dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, it should have done so without prejudice to appellant to amend. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Anderson, 360 So.2d 473, 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DANAHY and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Kozel v. Ostendorf
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 24, 1992
    ...counsel to draft a complaint that would better facilitate subsequent proceedings in the case. See Countryside Christian Center, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 542 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The dismissal of the amended complaint with prejudice is a more difficult issue. There are numerous ......
  • Winselmann v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1997
    ...is clearly untenable, it is an abuse of discretion to dismiss a complaint with prejudice."); Countryside Christian Center, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 542 So.2d 1037, 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (finding error to dismiss complaint with prejudice where it is not clear that complaint cannot be Si......
  • Kovach v. McLellan
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 26, 1990
    ...prejudice. See generally Hamide v. State Dep't of Corrections, 548 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Countryside Christian Center, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 542 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Crews v. Ellis, 531 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson, 448 So.2d 621 (F......
  • Hamide v. State Dept. of Corrections
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 13, 1989
    ...408 So.2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Town of Micanopy v. Connell, 304 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Countryside Christian Center, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 542 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Albrecht v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund, 481 So.2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Dinge......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT