County of Durham v. NCDENR
Decision Date | 17 November 1998 |
Docket Number | No. COA98-157.,COA98-157. |
Citation | 131 NC App. 395,507 S.E.2d 310 |
Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Parties | COUNTY OF DURHAM, Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, Appellee, and Currin Bros., Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee. |
Assistant Durham County Attorney Lesley F. Moxley, Durham, for petitioner-appellant County of Durham.
Attorney General Michael F. Easley by Assistant Attorney General Nancy E. Scott, for the respondent-appellee North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Poyner & Spruill, L.L.P. by Timothy P. Sullivan, Raleigh, for intervenor-appellee Currin Bros., Inc.
Located within the County of Durham (County) are three Land Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) landfills, two of which are owned and operated by Intervenor-Appellee, Currin Brothers. As LCID landfills, each is permitted to receive solid waste generated from land clearing activities, yard trash, untreated or unpainted wood, and solid waste that is virtually inert and likely to retain its physical and chemical structure. See N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-290(a)(14)-(15) (1997). The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) approved the applications for each of the LCID landfills and issued permits for their operation "in accordance with Article 9, Chapter 130A, of the General Statutes of North Carolina and all rules promulgated thereunder." NCDENR notified County's planning department of the proposed landfills and County provided NCDENR with zoning approval letters. See N.C. Admin. Code tit. 15A, r. 13B.0565 (January 1993) ( ). A public hearing was not held prior to the approval of the permits nor was the clerk to the board of commissioners informed of the applications.
Pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 150B-45 (1991), County requested a declaratory ruling from NCDENR that (1) LCID landfills are not "demolition landfills" within the meaning of N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-294(a)(4)a. (1997), and (2) LCID landfills are subject to the notice and hearing provisions of N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-294(b1)(2) (1997). On 20 November 1996, NCDENR issued a declaratory ruling that LCID landfills are not "sanitary landfills" pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-294(a)(4)a. and that the notice procedures under the statute only apply to sanitary landfills. Thus, NCDENR concluded, the notice requirements of the statute do not apply to LCID landfills.
County then filed a petition for judicial review of NCDENR's findings, pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 150B-4 (1991). On 28 October 1997, the Superior Court of Durham County upheld the declaratory ruling issued by NCDENR. County appeals.
468 U.S. 1227, 105 S.Ct. 28, 29, 82 L.Ed.2d 921 (1984). Thus we review this case de novo but accord considerable weight to NCDENR's interpretation of the statute at issue.
N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-294(a)(4)a. (1997). It is the permit requirements referred to in this statute that County brings to issue in this case. This single paragraph addresses several distinct categories of solid waste disposal facilities. A "landfill" is statutorily defined as a "disposal facility ... where waste is placed in or on land." N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-290(a)(16) (1997). Likewise, a "sanitary landfill" is defined as "a facility for disposal of solid waste on land in a sanitary manner in accordance with the rules concerning sanitary landfills." N.C. Gen.Stat. § 130A-290(a)(31) (1997) (emphasis added). Thus, NCDENR, cloaked with the rulemaking authority with regard to issues of solid waste management, determines how sanitary landfills are to be defined and managed.
By defining "demolition landfill" as "a sanitary landfill that is limited to receiving stumps, limbs, leaves, concrete, brick, wood, uncontaminated earth or other solid wastes as approved by the Division," NCDENR intended for demolition landfills to be a sub-category of, and thus encompassed by the rules concerning, sanitary landfills. N.C. Admin. Code. tit. 15A, r. 13B.0101(4) (October 1995) (emphasis added). Likewise, because of the language used in the rules, NCDENR did not intend for sanitary landfills to encompass LCID landfills. Rule 13B.0501 provides:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commissioner of Labor v. Weekley Homes, COA03-1634.
...the long-standing tradition of according deference to the agency's interpretation," County of Durham v. N.C. Dep't of Env't. & Natural Resources, 131 N.C.App. 395, 396, 507 S.E.2d 310, 311 (1998), disc. review denied, 350 N.C. 92, 528 S.E.2d 361 (1999), as long as the agency's interpretatio......
-
Lineberger v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
...novo review. Teasley v. Beck, 155 N.C.App. 282, 288, 574 S.E.2d 137, 141 (2002) (citing County of Durham v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Resources, 131 N.C.App. 395, 396, 507 S.E.2d 310, 311 (1998)). II. Defendants' First Defendants argue the declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiff was ......
-
Sound Rivers, Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of Envtl. Quality
...scientific expertise and judgment, and should be accorded deference. See County of Durham v. N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, 131 N.C. App. [395] at 396-97, 507 S.E.2d [310] at 311 (1998), disc. rev. denied, 350 N.C. 92, 528 S.E.2d 361 (1999).57. DWR's interpretation and app......
-
Midrex Technologies, Inc. v. N.C. Department of Revenue
...Davis Racing, 201 N.C.App. 35, 51, 684 S.E.2d 914, 925 (2009), or "considerable weight, " Cnty. of Durham v. N.C. Dep't of Env't & Natural Res., 131 N.C.App. 395, 397, 507 S.E.2d 310, 312 (1998). Other decisions have rejected the notion that agency interpretations are entitled to deference ......