County of Maricopa v. Arizona Tractor And Equipment Co.
Decision Date | 20 January 1941 |
Docket Number | Civil 4324 |
Citation | 56 Ariz. 518,109 P.2d 618 |
Parties | COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a Body Politic and Corporate, and THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellants, v. ARIZONA TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. M. T. Phelps, Judge. Judgment reversed and case remanded with instructions.
Mr. Joe Conway, Attorney General, Mr. Earl Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Richard F. Harless, County Attorney and Mr. Leslie C. Hardy, Deputy County Attorney, for Appellants.
Mr. E F. Thurman, for Appellee.
Arizona Tractor and Equipment Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit in the superior court of Maricopa county against the County of Maricopa and State of Arizona, hereinafter called defendants, for a declaratory judgment to ascertain against which, if any, of the parcels of real estate described in its complaint the lien of certain taxes levied against personal property owned by the plaintiff is impressed.
The facts of the case are not in dispute and may be stated as follows: Plaintiff, during the years 1931 to 1935, inclusive owned certain separate parcels of real estate situated in Maricopa county, Arizona, and also a large amount of personal property. During these years it became indebted to defendants in the sum of $6,968.40 by reason of delinquent personal property taxes, interest and penalties for the years 1933 and 1934. Among the real property owned by it was lot 12 of Mitchell's addition to the city of Phoenix, and by February 1, 1938, there were on it delinquent real estate taxes in the sum of $98.81. The treasurer of Maricopa county noticed and advertised lot 12, supra, for sale for the collection of delinquent taxes, under article VIII of chapter 73, Arizona Code of 1939, and on February 1, 1938, no private bid having been made therefor, the lot was struck off to the State of Arizona for the amount of $7,067.21, being the real property tax against such lot plus all of the property tax above set forth, and a certificate of purchase was duly issued to the state, under the provisions of section 73-806, Arizona Code of 1939.
Defendants claim that the personal property taxes included in the amount of $7,067.21, for which lot 12, supra, was struck off to the State of Arizona, still remained as a lien on all the other real estate specified in the complaint, for the reason that such tax has never been paid. Plaintiff, however, contends that the striking off of lot 12 to the state, as aforesaid, for all of the real and personal property taxes above set forth, released its other real estate from the tax lien of the personal property taxes. The evidence showed that it was the custom of the treasurer of Maricopa county, when there were a number of pieces of real estate assessed to the owner and also certain personal property taxes due from such owner, to assess the personal property tax against certain selected pieces of such real estate only, and not against all of the real estate of the taxpayer situated within the county, and, if the taxes were delinquent, at the tax sale made under article VIII, supra, to charge the entire personal property tax against such real estate only, and that this custom was followed in regard to the particular lot and personal property taxes referred to herein.
The question is one of considerable importance to the state, involving as it does its ability to collect a large portion of its personal property taxes. If the contention of plaintiff is correct, a taxpayer owning a number of parcels of real estate, and owing to the state thousands of dollars of personal property taxes, as in the present case, may have its entire personal property tax assessed against a piece of real estate of nominal value, and by it being struck off to the state, release the personal property tax lien on all its other real estate, even though the real estate sold may not be worth one-tenth of the tax, and since personal property taxes are not a charge against the owner, but against the property, and the proceeding to collect taxes is one in rem, the owner may thus write off nearly all of its personal property taxes. Whether this be true or not depends upon the statutes governing the assessment of taxes and their liens and the law of tax sales. Section 73-506, Arizona Code of 1939, sets forth the law in regard to the lien of taxes in Arizona, as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hallenbeck v. Yuma County
... ... YUMA COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Arizona; GILA VALLEY POWER DISTRICT, a Municipal Corporation; and R. E. LEE, JR., ... Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Maricopa County, 41 ... Ariz. 304, 17 P.2d 1096; Ingraham v ... Forman, 49 Ariz. 29, 63 P.2d 998; Maricopa ... County v. Arizona Tractor & Equipment Co., 56 ... Ariz. 518, 109 P.2d 618; Board of Sup'rs v ... ...
-
Davis v. State
...the lien for such personal property taxes attaches to each and every parcel of such real property. Maricopa County v. Arizona Tractor & Equipment Co., 56 Ariz. 518, 523, 109 P.2d 618 (1941). Property set aside as a homestead after the lien for unpaid personal property taxes had attached to ......
-
Allied American Inv. Co. v. Pettit, 4915
...by our holding in Santos v. Simon, supra; Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. City of Phoenix, 51 Ariz. 455, 77 P.2d 818; and County of Maricopa v. Arizona T. & E. Co., supra. For moment we will pass appellant's third proposition of law. His fourth proposition is that the formal dedication of the st......
-
Shumway v. State
... ... 400 L. D. SHUMWAY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF ARIZONA, W. H. LINVILLE, County Treasurer of Maricopa County and ... 29, 63 P.2d ... 998; Maricopa County v. Arizona Tractor & ... Equipment Co., 56 Ariz. 518, 109 P.2d 618. Under ... ...