Cowan v. Cowan

Decision Date31 May 1885
Citation139 Mass. 377,1 N.E. 152
PartiesCOWAN v. COWAN.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

R.M. Morse, Jr., and H.L. Harding, for libelant.

FIELD, J.

The libelant was, at the time the libel was signed and filed, and ever since has been, under guardianship as an insane person, and actually insane. The argument against granting the divorce is that the wife has no wish to obtain a divorce, as she is incapable of having any actual wishes or opinions, and that the court ought not to grant a divorce at the request of her guardian and relations because they think it would be beneficial to her to obtain a divorce on the ground that her husband might thus be prevented from interfering with or ultimately sharing in her property. That the court has the power to grant a divorce on the petition of the guardian of an insane person is clear. Pub.St. c. 146, § 7; Garnett v. Garnett, 114 Mass. 379. There is no suggestion that the insanity of the libelant is temporary, or that she is likely at any time hereafter to be in such a condition of mind that her wishes and feelings can be ascertained, and there are no children. The libelee does not appear. The facts proved show a gross case of utter desertion; the libelant has considerable property, inherited from her father nearly seven years after the desertion began. We think the facts show a case in which the court can properly now exercise the power it has, and that neither public policy nor the interests of the parties require a continuance of the libel. See Baker v. Baker, 5 Prob.Div. 142; same case on appeal, 6 Prob.Div. 12.

In accordance with the terms of the report a divorce nisi from the bonds of matrimony must be decreed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Turner v. Bell
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1955
    ... ... Cowan v. Cowan, 139 Mass. 377, 1 N.E. 152; Dillon v. Dillon, Tex.Civ.App., 274 S.W. 217; 17 Am.Jur. Divorce & Separation, Sec. 272 citing cases from Ga., ... ...
  • Samis v. Samis
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • February 18, 2011
    ...divorce actions on behalf of legally incompetent individuals. Cohn v. Carlisle, 310 Mass. 126, 37 N.E.2d 260, 262 (1941); Cowan v. Cowan, 139 Mass. 377, 1 N.E. 152, 152 (1885); Garnett v. Garnett, 114 Mass. 379, 380 (1874). This explicit statutory directive led the court in Cowan to reject ......
  • Mohrmann v. Kob
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • November 18, 1943

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT